|
kat321 -> RE: Here we go again...Con-didate Compares Public Schools To Nazi Regime (8/2/2011 5:31:05 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Pennsylvania is the latest (35 school districts), and whether its for bonuses or pay increases its irrelevant, its all to get more money to spend. And there is always an element of test taking ability in any standardized test, but they are highly correlated with success at the next higher grade/level. If teachers teach the test instead of the subject matter they arent doing their jobs, so saying that is the end result of having standardized testing is just condemning them, not the tests. Actually, no. Standardized tests have a very limited range of what they can predict in terms of student achievement. Take a look at the College Board website. An SAT or ACT, when taken with a student's GPA and other data can only generally predict 'success' in the first year of college, with 'success' being defined as a student earning a D average. Even the AP and IB tests only extend as far a content area knowledge- not success in the next level of schooling. K-12 tests like the Terra Nova or ITBS (two of the big K-12 tests) also only can lay claim to limited student predictors- and they do not foretell how well a student will do in the next grade. For instance, the Terra Nova uses IRT, which statistically aligns student responses with ability traits, the strength of student ability being dependent upon the strength of how the question is written. The score can answer how well a student answers a question that the testing company says aligns with state standards, but it cannot and is not meant to predict student achievement or any form of success at the next grade level. Since most psychometricians are taught the same evaluation theories, most tests are built on similar models. Results are even more diluted now as states develop their own tests. Since limited resources are placed on the test construction process, the test themselves are weakened measured and the strength of their supposed results are debatable.
|
|
|
|