LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
There are a few trains of thought that I have with this. The first is that we tend to do what we have trained ourselves to do on message boards. We give opinions and advice to the questions that have been asked. As I said on one of the threads you referenced, erin, it is impossible to understand an entire relationship within the content of a couple of written paragraphs. It is this very fact that leads us to assumptions, because there is no alternative. We can have no way to do better than that. Not unless we live the life that anyone who brings a question here lives. As people, we come to our conclusions in various ways. One of those is personal experience, directly related to our own feelings should we find a similarity in a story or question. For example. it stands to reason that someone who has been hurt by a partner who has cheated on them, might be one of those who speak loudest when someone brings an issue of being cheated on. Their own past experience, tied with that emotion, will color an opinion. Judgment and moral compass are other ways, as when asked a question, we internalize the situation, and reply with what it is that we would do. There are other ways as well, but I think the above applies to your question. I tend to think that, when we as a general populace of a discussion board are asked a question or for advice, we answer emotionally, because we have no fact to base our opinions on. It might not be possible to use logic in many instances, because we have no hard core evidence of which to base a decision. It is the best we have to offer, other than to skip the question entirely. Wouldn't make much left for a discussion, or for replies in seeking answers, would it?
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|