EPGAH
Posts: 500
Joined: 12/25/2006 Status: offline
|
It means that the third-worlders are encroaching upon us, spewing endlessly about how their "need" overwhelms our laws, and how they're "only doing it to make their lives better"(TM), but they don't know/care that it makes the First World areas worse. Check the areas settled by illegals...Just don't go alone, and certainly don't go at night, they're every bit as violent as the third-world wastelands these invaders "escaped" from...Broken bottles, violent crime, lack of functional English (Of course, I speak only about illegals in AMERICA, I'm sure the UK has some magic way to force THEIR illegals to learn English and behave, right?) Our way of life is being eroded, but more quietly, since these very thieves have probably figured out that the First World would kick their asses back to the Stone Age, if they tried any overt military action, but killing First Worlders who wander into their new "territory" will just be dismissed as normal crimes, and/or part of their "culture"...Why do we tolerate erosion of our sovereignty by criminals, simply because their "culture" is different than ours? The idea of immigration USED to be "I want the benefits you have, so I'll ask for permission to come in, learn and abide by your laws and ways (at least in public), and even learn your language, becoming something your country can be proud of!" Now: "I want the benefits you have, so I'll just barge in, regardless of boundaries/treaties, take relentlessly from you, ignore your laws and ways, and force you to adopt OUR ways and language, becoming something of a cancer on your country--but you can't fight us, because that would be 'racist'!" If they TRULY aspire to "a better life" here, why do they settle at/settle for the bottom socio-economic rung? Of course, part of it is that they refuse to dump their "culture" and assimilate, which SEVERELY limits career-opportunities, but again, why is that? If their "culture" is better, they could stay "home" and make something out of themselves and their countries without having to dip a siphon into the First World. If on the other hand, their "culture" is the reason for their widespread poverty/overcrowding/disease, wouldn't the same "greedy genes"/self-preservative instincts that "forced" them to invade the First World also "force" them to assimilate?
< Message edited by EPGAH -- 10/30/2007 1:30:30 PM >
|