StacyCat
Posts: 112
Joined: 1/11/2006 Status: offline
|
Hey that was me! :-) I inspired a thread! :-d For me, it really depends on the relationship. I have Tops that I play with that I would flip out if we started a beating scene that turned sexual. whereas, if we had negotiated sexuality before hand, it wouldnt be that big of a deal. So, someone new that I am playing with at a play party, I would be mad. But, in a sexual BDSM relationship, I might expect sexuality to be a part of it, and be comfortable if it took place. But, you have to realize that subspace is an interesting place. I have the weirdest thoughts of what I would enjoy while in subspace, and if asked by my top, I would almost always agree to them. but, that is altered consent. I wouldnt fuck a guy that was drunk unless he would fuck me while he was sober. The whole "they didnt use a safeword" takes the blame away from the dominant (where it belongs) and places it on the sub. "You didnt say that you didnt want to be ass fucked, and you didnt call your safeword, its your fault that it happened." They may have enjoyed it while out of it, but waking up with a sore ass the next day and remembering little of it, thats grounds for a rape charge. In short term play type arrangements, I wouldnt go beyond what was specifically negotiated, or what I agreed to as a sub. In a longer term relationship, there is little negotiation, and more is permitted and tolerated. Some guy I just met is not fucking me, whereas my Dom might have free reign of that.
|