enigmaslave
Posts: 146
Joined: 5/6/2006 Status: offline
|
I think that’s a great question, First off, let’s make the fallowing presumption. The environment and the amount of space would be self determining of whether couples would chose to continue to live there. 2000 sq feet may seem like a lot for a single, but a couple its starts getting a little tighter, and then add a child or two ....well I say no more. There would be an elected Board for the complex, and the complex would be a designated as a corporation. Included would be provisions for wanting to have children, in such a event, the attempt would be made to assist the couple into the getting a town house, presuming they weren’t in one to begin with. My vision for this property was that it would be in area away from any sizable population. The housing on the property would be large circle of 20 town houses surrounding the perimeter of the property, and then a 10 story condominium building in the middle. The 10 story building would have up to 5 levels below ground, for all cars, swimming and recreation facilities, Non vanilla recreation rooms, storage, and large rooms and offices for those that would be self employed or work from home. As a cooperative, the residents would attempt to minimize any contract work by performing the work them selves. I envision people owning shares of the property rather then the individual unites, and paying a maintenance fee. When the time came, and people wanted to move on, they would sell their shares back to the complex, rather having to wait for months for the unit to find a buyer. Again this is an idea. I don’t know the feasibility, no the legalities
_____________________________
my appreciation to A/all who have read my opinion. enigmaslave slrn 000145067
|