|
RapierFugue -> RE: NFL Sob (or Brag) Thread (1/29/2011 9:01:05 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub Ok a good place to call it even...but may I ask this... If you were in that situation what would your personal response be? Now far myself...If I were getting a 1/2 million for 2-1/2 hours work...and I had a my teammates depending on me along with the fans of my city I would take that chance…but that is me…How about you? With an arm or shoulder injury, fine. There's not too much more you can do, damage wise, than has already been done, assuming you're not talking spiral fracture or similar, but then you wouldn’t be playing with one of those. Knees are seriously different things. Ankles also, if it's severe enough. I wouldn't risk the end of my career at age 27 just to keep a bunch of baying idiots (meaning those fans criticising him after the game when they knew nothing, not the genuine Bears fans) happy. I've played (rugby) with injuries before, including a broken arm and a partially dislocated shoulder (though not at the same time) due to the team running out of allowed substitutions - I honestly think I did more harm than good to the team, because people rely on you to be able to do certain things and if you can't do all you would normally do they can't react to that fast enough, if you follow me. So they think "pass to RF!" or "he'll bind on there and push them back so I'll ..." and then before their brains can chime in with "but he's not fully mobile ATM" or "but he can't catch the ball as well as usual" the deed is done, and the opposition, not being complete idiots, will take the opportunity to hit the weak spot hard. The time I played with the broken, studded arm I also got knocked out, twice, purely because my usual ability to defend myself was reduced to near zero. The point is that he wasn't doing them any good - his throwing, possibly (indeed probably, IMHO) as a result of the injury and inability to set himself correctly (or at least as a factor), was well off. Hence them doing better with their 3rd string guy. But, as I said at the time, you can't give a team as good as the Packers a 2TD lead, early on, through fairly average (and I'm being charitable here) defence, and expect your offence to pick up the pieces. Their loss wasn't down to Cutler; their loss was down to them not playing well enough, across the board.
|
|
|
|