zumala
Posts: 1121
Joined: 6/16/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kagesuta quote:
ORIGINAL: mstrjx But for some people, distance and/or relocation means that you are examining someone not easily able to 'touch'. So, to extend the question, how do you determine veracity in what starts out as long-distance (hoping to move to R/T)? I'm curious to know this as well, albeit for my own reference... I've had an e-mail correspondence going on with someone for a few weeks now, but I'm still not sure about them. On the one hand, they seem to know and like exactly what I want, but I still have a nagging suspicion that it might be too good to be true. Things I've already tried include searching for uses of a person's name and e-mail address in websites. Google will typically find some kind of article on just about anybody, if they've used the internet long enough. It can be a good way of finding things out, when the person in question won't tell you about themselves. When in doubt, trust your gut feeling. Never rush in where your intestines fear to tread. If this person's given you their name, you can probably find out a lot about them. But I suspect 'supa spy' tactics might make them nervous about /you/ instead if they learn of it. Honestly, time will always tell. For LDR, I've found that it works for me if I go like this (no particular time frames set for any phase): 1) e-mail, 2) chat, 3) phone and THEN 4) face-to-face meeting somewhere public. Never be in a hurry. There should be a plethora of things you can discuss online that will further illuminate this person's character. If they won't talk or keep steering to topics already covered, I'd be suspicious. zuma
|