RE: Fracking is perfectly safe....

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe....

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Fracking is perfectly safe....

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe.... - 4/1/2014 6:56:14 PM

Tkman117

Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline

Could you supply some honest to god links instead of spewing verbal vomit with no intellectual substance.

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe.... - 4/1/2014 7:00:10 PM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

Could you supply some honest to god links instead of spewing verbal vomit with no intellectual substance.

Ah ad hominem attacks the last respite of the factually challenged.

Will this do?

http://energyindepth.org/national/the-continuing-fraud-of-gasland/

(in reply to Tkman117)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe.... - 4/1/2014 7:23:29 PM

Tkman117

Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline

Not necessarily ad hominem when past examples have shown to support my statement

But yes, much better, thank you. But why are you quoting a biased source funded by oil and gas companies? Unless of course you don't care about bias

Still, it's a compelling article, I will admit, with a lot of good information. But there are plenty of other sources which speak to the contrary with further data.

http://www.nature.com/scientificamerican/journal/v305/n5/full/scientificamerican1111-80.html
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3222989/reload=0;jsessionid=lCtUefinn7NTZmQjEHFM.18
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1167312

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe.... - 4/1/2014 7:31:47 PM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

Not necessarily ad hominem when past examples have shown to support my statement

But yes, much better, thank you. But why are you quoting a biased source funded by oil and gas companies? Unless of course you don't care about bias

Still, it's a compelling article, I will admit, with a lot of good information. But there are plenty of other sources which speak to the contrary with further data.

http://www.nature.com/scientificamerican/journal/v305/n5/full/scientificamerican1111-80.html
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3222989/reload=0;jsessionid=lCtUefinn7NTZmQjEHFM.18
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1167312

First article is an abstract. Which says nothing about the topic. Please quote a section you think is relevent.
Second article: I have never disputed fracking CAN lead to methane. So this post agrees with me. The question was - does igniteable water occur other than fracking and the answer is clear. It does.

Third article says there is no evidence of health risks from fracking. How does that support your position.

Look man - do you think people don't actually look at your cites? Three attempts, three whiffs.

As for "other (better) sources" I don't think your sources are better than the grand jury that found fraud. Do you?

(in reply to Tkman117)

Profile

Post #: 44

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe.... - 4/2/2014 4:54:15 PM

LookieNoNookie

Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

Could you supply some honest to god links instead of spewing verbal vomit with no intellectual substance.

Ah ad hominem attacks the last respite of the factually challenged.

Will this do?

http://energyindepth.org/national/the-continuing-fraud-of-gasland/

Oh STOP!!!! You're using facts, truth, actual basis.....that isn't what we do here!!!!

I refuse to read your posts from this point forward because of your inherent need to use reality.

(I'm sorry, I simply can't go there).

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 45

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe.... - 4/2/2014 4:56:35 PM

LookieNoNookie

Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

Not necessarily ad hominem when past examples have shown to support my statement

But yes, much better, thank you. But why are you quoting a biased source funded by oil and gas companies? Unless of course you don't care about bias

Still, it's a compelling article, I will admit, with a lot of good information. But there are plenty of other sources which speak to the contrary with further data.

http://www.nature.com/scientificamerican/journal/v305/n5/full/scientificamerican1111-80.html
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3222989/reload=0;jsessionid=lCtUefinn7NTZmQjEHFM.18
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1167312

I'm just gonna throw something out....just throwing darts here....

"Because everyone can now debate truth instead of unadulterated hyperbole?"

< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 4/2/2014 4:57:52 PM >

(in reply to Tkman117)

Profile

Post #: 46

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe.... - 4/2/2014 4:59:46 PM

Tkman117

Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline

I'll alter the question, why would you quote a source which would profit from lying? Why would you trust such a source?

< Message edited by Tkman117 -- 4/2/2014 5:01:49 PM >

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)

Profile

Post #: 47

RE: Fracking is perfectly safe.... - 4/2/2014 10:53:33 PM

LookieNoNookie

Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline