Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Excuse me, but...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Excuse me, but... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 12:18:30 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
If I remember my polysci class correctly, a police state is a state in which the government exercises rigid and repressive controls over the social, economic, and political life of the population.

Okay, this morning, "Million Bikers to DC" and Military Veterans destroyed barricades blocking access to a memorial under the watchful eye of DC and Park Service police officers.

The "minions" of the police state did not do their job under the rules of police state ethics, they made no arrests, they beat no one with night sticks, they did not even fire a weapon.

They used anything but draconian methods to deal with the protestors.

source

Now compared to Kent State, dealing with the protests at UC Berkley, and others during the Nixon years, I do believe that the oppressive force playbook got lost in the period from Nixon to Obama.

Considering that the Republican House would not even look at a budget that did not defund Obamacare, and after looking over the powers given the president by the constitution, I confirmed what I already thought I knew.

1) The president cannot arbitrarily decide on a national budget, he has to be presented one from the legislative branch.

2) The president has no control over what is considered essential expenditures and what is not essential.

So someone want to explain how all of this is just President Obama's fault?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 12:25:47 PM   
AdorkableAiley


Posts: 920
Joined: 9/12/2011
Status: offline
It's not but he is the figure head, the man in charge so he is going to shoulder the blame. He knew this when he ran for office.


Ailey

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 3:01:47 PM   
sloguy02246


Posts: 534
Joined: 11/5/2011
Status: offline
Obviously you do not watch the "fair and balanced" news on Fox.
Tune in to any of their commentary programs. It matters not who is talking or what the topic is. After watching for only a few seconds, you will find out that President Obama is indeed the one, true source of all that is wrong and evil in our country and society.
Oh, if only John McCain had been elected in 2008! All of us would now be leading lives where we are all rich, famous, and incredibly happy.


(in reply to AdorkableAiley)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 3:19:03 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
If I remember my polysci class correctly, a police state is a state in which the government exercises rigid and repressive controls over the social, economic, and political life of the population.
Okay, this morning, "Million Bikers to DC" and Military Veterans destroyed barricades blocking access to a memorial under the watchful eye of DC and Park Service police officers.
The "minions" of the police state did not do their job under the rules of police state ethics, they made no arrests, they beat no one with night sticks, they did not even fire a weapon.
They used anything but draconian methods to deal with the protestors.
source
Now compared to Kent State, dealing with the protests at UC Berkley, and others during the Nixon years, I do believe that the oppressive force playbook got lost in the period from Nixon to Obama.
Considering that the Republican House would not even look at a budget that did not defund Obamacare, and after looking over the powers given the president by the constitution, I confirmed what I already thought I knew.
1) The president cannot arbitrarily decide on a national budget, he has to be presented one from the legislative branch.
2) The president has no control over what is considered essential expenditures and what is not essential.
So someone want to explain how all of this is just President Obama's fault?


Who is saying this is just Obama's fault?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 3:26:58 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Rep. Steve King Says Any Government Shutdown Will Be the Fault of Obama 'Tantrum' - Not Republicans

Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio, said Mr. Obama was to blame for his refusal to deal with the fiscal crisis.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., authored a blistering piece in the Washington Post that lambasted Mr. Obama for ignoring Congress and instead overreaching on his executive powers.

Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-OK; Rep. Mo Brooks, R-AL; Fox News; Stuart Varney

Jon Stewart Calls out Republicans for not Owning The Shutdown: 'Don't Fart And Point At The Dog'

In this short clip from the opening of Tuesday's "Daily Show," Jon Stewart vows to not talk about the shutdown... except for that one little bit about the Republicans saying they aren't responsible for it.

In a cathartic moment that most of us can appreciate, Stewart calls bullsh*t after rolling a clip of Speaker John Boehner admitting that he had made a deal with Harry Reid that he then broke:

"Look, you think Obamacare's a big enough threat to this country that you need to shut down the government over it, fine. Own it. Don't fart and point at the dog."

Watch video: http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/tue-october-8-2013-malala-yousafzai


< Message edited by kalikshama -- 10/13/2013 4:01:59 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 3:48:49 PM   
Just0Us0Two


Posts: 135
Joined: 6/3/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sloguy02246
Obviously you do not watch the "fair and balanced" news on Fox.
Tune in to any of their commentary programs. It matters not who is talking or what the topic is. After watching for only a few seconds, you will find out that President Obama is indeed the one, true source of all that is wrong and evil in our country and society.


Which is oh so different from the way other "fair and balanced" news sources act when a Republican is in the hot seat?

(in reply to sloguy02246)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 4:31:15 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Rallier tells Obama to 'put the Quran down'
Posted by
CNN's Ashley Killough and Shannon Travis and Brian Rokus
Updated 3:37 p.m. ET, 10/13/2013

Washington (CNN) - Angered by the closure of national landmarks due to the partial government shutdown, a crowd of conservatives removed barricades Sunday at the World War II Memorial and the Lincoln Memorial as they rallied against President Barack Obama and Democrats for their role in the ongoing stalemate.

High-profile speakers with close ties to the tea party appeared at the event, including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.



The rally, billed as the "Million Vet March on the Memorials," drew far fewer than a million people and evolved into a protest that resembled familiar tea party events from 2009, with yellow "Don't Tread On Me" flags throughout the crowd and strong anti-Obama language from the podium and the audience.

One speaker went as far as saying the president was a Muslim and separately urged the crowd of hundreds to initiate a peaceful uprising.

"I call upon all of you to wage a second American nonviolent revolution, to use civil disobedience, and to demand that this president leave town, to get up, to put the Quran down, to get up off his knees, and to figuratively come out with his hands up," said Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, a conservative political advocacy group.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/13/at-tea-party-like-rally-obama-told-to-put-the-quran-down/?hpt=hp_t2


weeeeeeee

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Just0Us0Two)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 6:04:33 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
Rep. Steve King Says Any Government Shutdown Will Be the Fault of Obama 'Tantrum' - Not Republicans


Did you even read the article, or just the headline?!?

LMAO!

I took your first link and no others were even needed.
    quote:

    So the House will make sure that the funds are available. And if the president should decide he’s going to shut down the government, it will never be the House of Representatives, if this happens it will be either an act of either Harry Reid and the Democrats in the Senate or the president or them working in conjunction with each other,” King said. “If the president decides to shut the government down, it will be the equivalent of a political tantrum, saying ‘I will have my piece of signature legislation even if the American people reject it and I’ll punish you by shutting the government down if I don’t get my way.’”


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 6:07:02 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Rallier tells Obama to 'put the Quran down'
Posted by
CNN's Ashley Killough and Shannon Travis and Brian Rokus
Updated 3:37 p.m. ET, 10/13/2013
Washington (CNN) - Angered by the closure of national landmarks due to the partial government shutdown, a crowd of conservatives removed barricades Sunday at the World War II Memorial and the Lincoln Memorial as they rallied against President Barack Obama and Democrats for their role in the ongoing stalemate.
High-profile speakers with close ties to the tea party appeared at the event, including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.
The rally, billed as the "Million Vet March on the Memorials," drew far fewer than a million people and evolved into a protest that resembled familiar tea party events from 2009, with yellow "Don't Tread On Me" flags throughout the crowd and strong anti-Obama language from the podium and the audience.
One speaker went as far as saying the president was a Muslim and separately urged the crowd of hundreds to initiate a peaceful uprising.
"I call upon all of you to wage a second American nonviolent revolution, to use civil disobedience, and to demand that this president leave town, to get up, to put the Quran down, to get up off his knees, and to figuratively come out with his hands up," said Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, a conservative political advocacy group.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/13/at-tea-party-like-rally-obama-told-to-put-the-quran-down/?hpt=hp_t2
weeeeeeee


I only have two comments to these knuckleheads (the people in the article):

1. Shut the fuck up about Obama being a Muslim.
2. Even if he is Muslim, who the fuck cares?!? Isn't the President free to practice a religion of his choice?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 6:10:42 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

You are becoming my hero.

----------------

GOOD NEWS

The Republican noise machine is no longer talking about the IRS, Benghazi, White Water, Monica Lewinski, Reverand Wright, Muslin memorials near the WTC site, or bombing IRAN.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 11:47:42 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
.
One speaker went as far as saying the president was a Muslim and separately urged the crowd of hundreds to initiate a peaceful uprising.
"I call upon all of you to wage a second American nonviolent revolution, to use civil disobedience, and to demand that this president leave town, to get up, to put the Quran down, to get up off his knees, and to figuratively come out with his hands up," said Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, a conservative political advocacy group.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/13/at-tea-party-like-rally-obama-told-to-put-the-quran-down/?hpt=hp_t2
weeeeeeee


I only have two comments to these knuckleheads (the people in the article):

1. Shut the fuck up about Obama being a Muslim.
2. Even if he is Muslim, who the fuck cares?!? Isn't the President free to practice a religion of his choice?
unnique

Yep. It appears that the Right's idea of freedom of religion only extends to those religions the Right finds acceptable.

Sadly, this kind of blatant appeal to racism and racists is not something unique to the American Right. In my country, the Right does the same. Here the Right's outrage is directed at refugees, most of whom 'just happen' to be Muslims. In the UK, the Right howls against 'immigration' and incites hate against racial minorities. Ditto in France .....

Historically, the Right has fought vociferously against just about every measure to combat racism everywhere. While I suppose we can give them a tick for consistency, it is reprehensible that hate and racism still features strongly and centrally in so much of Right wing discourse.

There are many conservative folk who abhor racism as much as everyone else. Why do they tolerate hatemongers and racists in their ranks?

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 10/13/2013 11:59:44 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/13/2013 11:54:57 PM   
NoBimbosAllowed


Posts: 1450
Joined: 9/19/2013
Status: offline
The above message has been presented to you by self-published/can't get published outside of academic rort-circles-socialists seeking jobs in SBS TV but now are unlikely to due to the conservative backlash due to Greens and Labour shitting in their own refridgerator.com

And even Tim Minchin laughs.

hard.

< Message edited by NoBimbosAllowed -- 10/13/2013 11:55:23 PM >


_____________________________

It's all about the curvature of the female azzzzzzzzzzz, meaning Niki Minaj and Serena Williams and Kate Cerebrano, NEVER Kylie Minogue! Wooden Spoons and Ottoman scenes from Story of O, baby dolls!

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/14/2013 4:12:26 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
Rep. Steve King Says Any Government Shutdown Will Be the Fault of Obama 'Tantrum' - Not Republicans


Did you even read the article, or just the headline?!?

LMAO!

I took your first link and no others were even needed.

    quote:

    So the House will make sure that the funds are available. And if the president should decide he’s going to shut down the government, it will never be the House of Representatives, if this happens it will be either an act of either Harry Reid and the Democrats in the Senate or the president or them working in conjunction with each other,” King said. “If the president decides to shut the government down, it will be the equivalent of a political tantrum, saying ‘I will have my piece of signature legislation even if the American people reject it and I’ll punish you by shutting the government down if I don’t get my way.’”



Did you...READ...the article?

Rep. Steve King is saying that the President would not accept the Republican's bid for unconditional surrender of the United States of America to the Republican/Tea Party. Imagine if the Democrats and the President went along with this insanity for a moment, DS. Where would the Republican/Tea Party stop if they could remove any law currently on the books? Doesn't that sound just.....a little....like a tyrannical government? The Republican/Tea Party pushed a budget bill....THEY KNEW....the Democrats would....NEVER....sign off on in a million years.

So consider this as a way of helping you understand the problem:

Lets say things are reversed for this hypothetical situation. The Democrats control the House and the Republicans the Senate and White House. Still with me? Because now it gets harder. The Democrats push a bill to fund the budget how the Republicans want with one thing added: The Repeal of the 2nd Amendment. And would conservatives be outraged by this action the part of the Democrats? Of course they would be! But would the Republicans sign off on the bill? Not in a million-zillion years. So the government goes into shutdown. The Democrats keep pressing the issue on the belief their view on how things should be are 'correct'. All the while their approval rating takes a nose dive at a faster rate than the Republicans in the Senate. People would call the Democrats insane and out of control.

That's the reverse of what is going on right now, DS. Republican/Tea Party is trying to spin this in any and every way shape and form they can. They created the problems of the big deficit and the ever increasing US Debt back in 2000. They have resisted any and every attempt to both 'cut spending and raise taxes' to kill the deficit and start paying down the US Debt. They were the ones that created the problems that led this nation down an economic recession of epic proportions in 2006-2007. They were the ones that couldn't agree to a budget deal in 2008, resulting in the now historical 'super committee' that they help fail in 2009. They lost the election in 2012. An they are the ones that tried to end a current law in the USA by taking the nation's credit rating and economy hostage! They created the circumstances for the shutdown. An you want to blame the President and the Democrats for this mess? Hey, you like to blame the President and Democrats over the petty stuff; but at the same time write blank checks to the Republican/Tea Party.

This Rep. Steve King and his political party, are 100% at fault.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/14/2013 5:26:32 AM   
EdBowie


Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013
Status: offline
I thought you wanted to know who was blaming Obama? Your question was answered, why the moving of goalposts?
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Rallier tells Obama to 'put the Quran down'
Posted by
CNN's Ashley Killough and Shannon Travis and Brian Rokus
Updated 3:37 p.m. ET, 10/13/2013
Washington (CNN) - Angered by the closure of national landmarks due to the partial government shutdown, a crowd of conservatives removed barricades Sunday at the World War II Memorial and the Lincoln Memorial as they rallied against President Barack Obama and Democrats for their role in the ongoing stalemate.
High-profile speakers with close ties to the tea party appeared at the event, including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.
The rally, billed as the "Million Vet March on the Memorials," drew far fewer than a million people and evolved into a protest that resembled familiar tea party events from 2009, with yellow "Don't Tread On Me" flags throughout the crowd and strong anti-Obama language from the podium and the audience.
One speaker went as far as saying the president was a Muslim and separately urged the crowd of hundreds to initiate a peaceful uprising.
"I call upon all of you to wage a second American nonviolent revolution, to use civil disobedience, and to demand that this president leave town, to get up, to put the Quran down, to get up off his knees, and to figuratively come out with his hands up," said Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, a conservative political advocacy group.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/13/at-tea-party-like-rally-obama-told-to-put-the-quran-down/?hpt=hp_t2
weeeeeeee


I only have two comments to these knuckleheads (the people in the article):

1. Shut the fuck up about Obama being a Muslim.
2. Even if he is Muslim, who the fuck cares?!? Isn't the President free to practice a religion of his choice?



(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/14/2013 5:36:52 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
There are many conservative folk who abhor racism as much as everyone else. Why do they tolerate hatemongers and racists in their ranks?


There are racists in pretty much every group.

This is really about freedom of religion and not racial discrimination, though.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/14/2013 6:53:28 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
There are many conservative folk who abhor racism as much as everyone else. Why do they tolerate hatemongers and racists in their ranks?


There are racists in pretty much every group.

This is really about freedom of religion and not racial discrimination, though.


Sorry DS, but the Right doesn't get off so easily. You might find racists in any given group of people but you only find organised racism on the Right. The KKK weren't a group of bleeding heart liberals were they?

The Right has a long history of organising racism, of profiting from racism, and opposing every anti-racist measure just about everywhere in the West. It will take a lot more than a few glib remarks for people to forgive the Right its past.

Especially as elements on the Right continue to fan flames of racism with little or no attempts to rein them in coming from Right wing leaders. Silence is complicity.

_____________________________



(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/14/2013 9:34:19 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
There are many conservative folk who abhor racism as much as everyone else. Why do they tolerate hatemongers and racists in their ranks?

There are racists in pretty much every group.
This is really about freedom of religion and not racial discrimination, though.

Sorry DS, but the Right doesn't get off so easily. You might find racists in any given group of people but you only find organised racism on the Right. The KKK weren't a group of bleeding heart liberals were they?
The Right has a long history of organising racism, of profiting from racism, and opposing every anti-racist measure just about everywhere in the West. It will take a lot more than a few glib remarks for people to forgive the Right its past.
Especially as elements on the Right continue to fan flames of racism with little or no attempts to rein them in coming from Right wing leaders. Silence is complicity.


Two things:

1. This was about religion, not race.
2. You might want to look into the KKK a bit further. I hope PBS isn't too conservative a site...
    quote:

    Dressed in robes and sheets, intended to prevent identification by the occupying federal troops (and supposedly designed to frighten blacks), the Klan quickly became a terrorist organization in service of the Democratic Party and white supremacy. Between 1869 and 1871 its goal was to destroy Congressional Reconstruction by murdering blacks -- and some whites -- who were either active in Republican politics or educating black children.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/14/2013 10:08:49 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Alright, the story line reads Vets, police clash at White House the video is a speech.

Then if you do a search on you tube for vets and police clash in DC you really dont see a clash.

Now when I see those headlines, I remember something along these Hippies, Cops, and The 1960's

Did the definition of clash change?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/14/2013 2:43:02 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
There are many conservative folk who abhor racism as much as everyone else. Why do they tolerate hatemongers and racists in their ranks?


There are racists in pretty much every group.

This is really about freedom of religion and not racial discrimination, though.


Sorry DS, but the Right doesn't get off so easily. You might find racists in any given group of people but you only find organised racism on the Right. The KKK weren't a group of bleeding heart liberals were they?

The Right has a long history of organising racism, of profiting from racism, and opposing every anti-racist measure just about everywhere in the West. It will take a lot more than a few glib remarks for people to forgive the Right its past.

Especially as elements on the Right continue to fan flames of racism with little or no attempts to rein them in coming from Right wing leaders. Silence is complicity.


Sorry. If you have to weigh whether the KKK was republican or democrat history will side with them being Democrat.
The KKK was instrumental in maintaining Jim Crow laws and Democrat power all the way to the 50's.

After the Civil Rights legistlation - the KKK never had anywhere near the power as previously - and while some did go republican at that point it was certainly only a shadow of its former self. But don't let history, or things like .. facts confuse you.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Excuse me, but... - 10/14/2013 3:44:29 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AdorkableAiley

It's not but he is the figure head, the man in charge so he is going to shoulder the blame. He knew this when he ran for office.


Ailey


Shouldering the blame for someone elses actions is not his job. His job is clearly defined in the constitution.
Sucking someones cock is not on his list of tasks according to the constitution.

(in reply to AdorkableAiley)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Excuse me, but... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.158