Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Mall Cop Gets Taken Down


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Mall Cop Gets Taken Down Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mall Cop Gets Taken Down - 5/25/2013 11:15:33 AM   
FrostedFlake


Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009
From: Centralia, Washington
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

It wouldn't be a Constitutional question, more of a state/local statute question as to if charges are pressed. Depending on the locale and situation, security guards/officers (there is a big difference depending on the wording here) have some of the protections afforded to the police regarding public interactions. They have to, because they have to have arrest powers to detain shoplifters.

That being said, those powers don't extend as far as they would if she were a LEO. Before I started as a bouncer,I had received training in both Cat II Peach Officer (UT), and Professional Armed Security (PSO Certificate) in the same state. More than half the curriculum was in use of force and limitations. In some jurisdictions, on-site security's powers can change literally by just going through a doorway. On one side of the threshhold, the have full warranted arrest powers, one step over, and they can be charged with assault and unlawful imprisonment, even if it's technically on mall property.

LEOs are turf-conscious, and have the backing of state law. They don't like ceding that to someone who takes six hours of company training and a poorly-fitting uniform. I can't say what the laws are where this incident occured, but the ones at a mall near me aren't permitted to do anything more than report, observe, and call the local PD when something happens in the parking lot. The only time they would be permitted to intervene is if someone's life were in imminent danger, the same as anybody else. And the fact she was there by herself said a lot of things to me.

Why was she alone? Why didn't she call for assistance before stepping in? Was she jumping into the scene to score points with her company or to add to her resume? Or did her supervisor send her there to see how she handled it? Or was she sent there with the full knowledge she'd screw up and they'd have a legitimate reason to fire her?

As a caveat, I never worked as mall security-the only uniformed security I did was a short gig doing nothing more than watching the parking lot of a bar and a temp job at ParkWest for a Grateful Dead concert where all I did was direct traffic and tell people to be a little more discreet about their recreational material usage. And it doubly-sucked that I couldn't see the band and couldn't hear them that well either.

I disagree with the part I bolded. To boil it down, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons against unreasonable..." This means there must be a reason. If the lady were the cop she seemed to think she was, she still would not be empowered to manhandle folk, absent a reason. But, as a cop, she would have extra protections against being hit BACK.

To compare the Mall Cop to me personally, last December a bike was stolen. And reported stolen. It is gone, gone, gone. No illusions, there. But, if I were to see it, I would certainly chase it down and THANK the person riding for bringing it back. I fully expect the thanks to go unappreciated. The next step is to whip out my cell phone and offer to summon a policeman, to settle things. Should the policeman be declined, I either leave with the bike or call that same policeman on my own hook. Should I be assaulted in the process of negotiations, I will use just enough force to end the assault, then resume negotiations.

My point is, that this is how the Mall Cop should have handled herself in the instance. Just exactly the way I do. Everyday. Because Mall Cop is not a cop. If she needs one, she should call one.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Frosted Flake
simul justus et peccator
Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube

"... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5

(in reply to MasterCaneman)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Mall Cop Gets Taken Down - 5/25/2013 11:39:17 AM   
MistressJude


Posts: 89
Joined: 1/8/2005
From: NC
Status: offline
Here you go LafayetteLady

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6i7C-IniHg

This security guard was obviously looking specifically for these guys but the reason is unknown. He did put his hands on them first and equally agitated the situation. However, PLEASE NOTE: this guard has BOTH a taser gun AND A REAL GUN. Further, he did call the police but he did increase the situation putting others at risk. When the guy went to leave the guard hit him in the chest and pushed him back. He also tasered the guy when he was not advancing and when his back was turning. But the point is - you have a mall security guard here with not one but two weapons.

So again - you can not make overall statements when you have no evidence in which to back it up other than your own, limited, personal opinion. Statements like "I don't believe they're armed but I could be mistaken" would be well within the scope of a reasonable discussion but you make statements as though they're fact with absolutely nothing other than "I said so" to back it up.

_____________________________

Sir Jude
*Don't be afraid to go out on a limb... that's where all the fruit is*
**The best way to make a dream come true is to wake up**

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Mall Cop Gets Taken Down - 5/25/2013 12:43:42 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
Nope.

Mall security are not cops, and aren't given police authority for the simple reason that no one is going to pay for them to go through the time and expense of becoming a sworn LEO, much less give them a competitive salary. As a result, nobody is required to 'listen to' them per se.
(As a general rule, they have the same right of citizen's arrest as anyone else). Even moonlighting off duty cops prefer better paying gigs than that.

Once you lunge for someone' throat, that's assault, once you make any contact, that's battery, and everyone has the right to defend themselves against a non-LEO. ''Imminent danger' has nothing to do with it, that's a line from Garner.

The punches didn't exceed any standard under American law. There is no Chuck Norris requirement in self defense.

Don't mistake the mall cop not being authorized to carry a weapon with the possibility that the individual person has a knife or worse in their pocket.

Bottom line:
> It looked like the group was standing on mall property, and should have left when told to. They were in the wrong on that.

> The guard should have used the radio, and gotten the police there to go through the steps for trespass in that particular state.

> The guard was wrong about the cameras, the USSC just let stand a ruling that even the police can't tell you to turn off cameras or confiscate them in public. Places that *can* take your cameras are clearly marked, such as military facilities. The mall can prohibit photography within the limits asking people to leave.

> Again, as a general rule, the owners of private property or their designated agents can 'escort' people, within reasonable guidelines. The guard was wrong to grab/push anyone, that type of playground lashing out isn't taught to cops or guards, so she was exceeding her training and crossing over into plain old assault and battery, which the citizen in the bike helmet had every right to neutralize with a reasonable amount of force... and that is exactly what the video shows her doing.

*Overall*, so much is wrong in that video, I'd almost think the whole thing was staged.



quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady


quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake

quote:

Apparently, in that area, mall security can carry handcuffs, and detain someone, however, none of that means she is putting someone in imminent danger and they have a right to put her on the ground and punch her half a dozen times. That isn't "subduing" someone.


No Ma'am. It isn't subduing someone. And that isn't what that person was trying to do. The Mall Pig is the one trying to subdue... ...a non-violent non-suspect. The non-violent non-suspect used her constitutional right to punch a richly deserving idiot, a few times. Not several. Regarding excess ; please note that at no time did the Mall Pig stop exceeding her authority.

I don't know what country you grew to manhood in, Ma'am, but here in the United States we have this thing called the Bill of Rights.

Example? Okay. Here is a picture of ME, ...not getting arrested.



Insults aside, the girl in the helmet does NOT have a constitutional right to punch the mall security officer a "few" (which is the same thing as several by the way) times. I would guess from the picture, you seem to think that you can not listen to police. If your attitude is anything like you just showed me, well then, I would say you resisted and earned what you got.

I'm very aware of the Bill of Rights, but for shits and giggles, why don't you point us all to the place that says the girl had a right to take her to the ground and pound her face "a few" times?




_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 43
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Mall Cop Gets Taken Down Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078