LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika Here is the crux. There are women who want men with no thoughts of their own and there are men who don't want to do any thinking. And then there are women who like thoughtful and proactive men and men who want to be thoughtful and proactive. I like a proactive guy, but he has to be smart about what he's proactive about. I would think that anyone who is looking for an actual relationship would prefer a guy who is at least a little proactive. Remember, though, I'm not talking about the guy who has lots of experience and who should know better. For those, I think that they deserve the response they get. quote:
Take a Domme that is looking for a romantic relationship with a submissive man. The bottom line is that she want to build a relationship which will include D/s intimacy so if a guy is going to approach her with proactive "sex stuff", he's going to fail. Why? Because he's going to be just another guy who treats her like life support for his kink. Again, when searching for a relationship, things are different. I don't believe that the "sex stuff" should be an "opener" at any time, and typically, yes, those who do are looking for someone to be "life support for his kink." However, when looking for a relationship that is going to involve kink, at some point the conversation about kink needs to occur. You (general you) could exchange 3-4 emails with a man talking about all the normal vanilla stuff and really be hitting it off, but then when you get to the likes/dislikes in kink, you can find yourselves so far apart that it will never work, not because he is looking for someone to be life support for his kink, but because your kinks are just too vastly different. He shouldn't expect you to give up your "must haves," but at the same time, you shouldn't expect him to give up his either. At that point you reach the inevitable, "I'm sorry we just won't be compatible" talk. What I AM talking about though is the guy that you have those 3-4 (or however many you want or need) emails and there seems to be some chemistry. You also know he is brand spanking new to BDSM and has never had a real life experience, not even with a pro. Personally, I don't like the brand spanking new inexperienced, and I don't know if you do, but for the sake of this discussion, let's say you do. So in your vanilla conversations, you are feeling some chemistry, some sparks. Then he mentions that he purchased something or is REALLY interested in a particular thing. Remember he is brand new, no experience. At that point, is it really wise, and even in YOUR best interest to say "no thank you," or to explain to him because you ARE experienced that his purchase was inappropriate because.....or explain that while he may be really interested in "x" as the sub, you would take that into consideration (should the relationship progress) but that as the dominant you would decide when and if "x" would happen? Because I do read how difficult the dommes are finding it to find someone who is going to be a good fit. So to me it makes no sense if you are talking to someone inexperienced, you had the non kink talks that went great, you feel the spark, the chemistry, but he made a "newbie" mistake, to dismiss him on that alone without at least trying to explain. If you explain and he gets pissy, the hell with him. But if you explain and he listens and makes every effort to correct it, if you were to dismiss on something so silly, you could be dismissing someone who would be a great partner, he just doesn't have the knowledge yet. quote:
If he is just looking for a kinky exchange, then maybe there would be less issue, I'm not sure. Depends on the woman. Some will be offended, some won't. Finding out what the woman likes before getting her something might be a good idea. Now in the case of simply a "play partner" with no strings attached, that whole thing changes, in my opinion, because no relationship is sought. At the same time though, I do see (with both men and women) that a few too many dominants aren't the least bit interested in the interests of the submissive, taking the attitude of "I'm in charge, I don't care what you want, you exist for my fun." Now that is fine plot for a scene, but if the submissive isn't getting anything out of the exchange, why bother? In any case, that wasn't the type of situation I was talking about. I was referring to the former, two people searching for a relationship. I, personally view those two situations very very differently. quote:
The only time I ever called people creeps is when they acted like one. Bottom line is that some messages are truly creepy. When it seemed someone was simply disillusioned, the best response I give is "no, thank you". If they ask why, I tried to point it out them. They usually don't get it right away and it will take time for them to figure it all out. In the past, when I was searching for a partner, this would be a very good indication right away that someone did not have the emotional maturity level to be with me. - LA No doubt, some "opening/introductory" messages are beyond creepy. Some are so completely bizarre, sick, shocking, tjat if you didn't realize the idiot was serious you would find it funny. But again, I'm not talking about those situation either. Although didn't someone recently start a thread on the weirdest introduction letters they had ever received? I seem to remember reading something like that and having to keep picking my jaw up off the desk at the oddness of them.
|