juliaoceania
Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006 From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent General reply..... Yes...I think it's reasonable to offer that it's anyone's guess as to how people would react in the most extreme circumstances....which has implications for identity and self-awareness. And the bloke you meet in the street who stops to chat and takes the time to give you directions...is he a Nazi in another situation? And what does all this mean for political views? What's interesting is that in such situations there are examples of people who have acted completely selflessly and actually given their lives so someone else can live - not a relative either. And there are those who will do anything to survive. And then there are those who when given the choice between death and standing by their principles have chosen death - and others who would sell their Grandmas for a few quid. I wonder how much of a role personal ethics can play in such decision making (when instructed by instinct)? and what is it that means some people will act selflessly in the most extreme circumstances and others will do what it takes to keep their heads above water. An interesting aside is that on the Titanic - by all accounts - it genuinely was a case of 'women and children first' while in other shipping disasters the number of men in relation to women and children who have survived suggests there was no sense of 'women and children' first - I wonder how much your cultural traditions can trump personal instinct when push comes to shove? I do not know if sacrificing oneself for unknown people is necessarily laudable. Many cultures celebrate martyrism , but is it necessarily something that makes someone a better person? Why should I sacrifice myself for a stranger? What makes this the ethical or right or laudable thing to do? In one circumstance the Soldier (perhaps Nazi )is applauded for his willingness to "follow orders", but in another circumstance he is condemned.... who decides which it the better behavior? I do not know how to answer these questions, but I do know that the answer is variable depending on where one lives and what culture they belong to... so the answer isn't just an individual thing, it is a societal thing. How I might react to an extreme situation is not a predetermined thing. I do not know, and to be honest, I do not spend much time contemplating that. I act in the best way possible according to my own conditioning of what is right and what is wrong from moment to moment. I do not even think I would like I know how I would react to an extreme situation (like what happened to Haiti for example), but there is one thing I know, I would not feel badly about however I reacted to it. I would accept the consequence of whatever actions (or lack of them) that I took. I would do what I felt was right, but at the same time I would probably take actions designed to save my own skin too... is that wrong? I think it is called "survival instinct". I have very little doubt that I would sacrifice myself for loved ones. I have went through much discomfort in my life for them, went without for those I love... but strangers? I do not know if I would or not. It isn't something I would feel bad about if I chose me and mine to live over others... what makes them more valuable than me? Would I expect someone else to sacrifice their own life for mine? Hardly. Just my view of it
_____________________________
Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt
|