|
UniqueRaven -> RE: servant or slave? (1/2/2010 2:08:45 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sissyshoefetish quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote:
ORIGINAL: johndafreak I'm just wondering, would being a servant give a higher more refined style of humiliation? I would treat a servant better than a slave Why would either automatically equate to humiliation? i feel slavery does implicitly contain humiliation (because the essence of slavery is removal of freedom and subjugation to anothers will) but that if you choose not to focus on this it can be overlooked; whereas being a servant allows you more access to dignity and affords you better treatment. OK, because i tend to be a bit geeky about semantics and definitions (i love to read, words are my friends) i went and looked humiliation up in the dictionary. Here's the definition: to cause (a person) a painful loss of pride, self-respect, or dignity; mortify. i have never felt a loss of pride, self-respect, or dignity as a slave, and wouldn't last long as a slave to an Owner who considered that a key part of my slavery, either. i also don't see humiliation as part of service, either - i think there's a great deal of pride in being a good servant that pleases my Master, and seeing the pride in his eyes is a huge reward for me. So no, i don't see humiliation as an implicit part of slavery - i see myself as an item of value to my Owner. And i'm always working to increase that value. Being subjugated to his will is not a humiliating place to be - it is simply the right place to be. And to answer the original question, i would say that i am slave, and service is a big part of my slavery. But i could not be a servant without being a slave, so if you asked me to choose between the two i would say slave, not servant. Humiliation training, on the other hand, is a separate activity, and a separate thread. *edited to fix an important "but" [&:]
|
|
|
|