DemonKia
Posts: 5521
Joined: 10/13/2007 From: Chico, Nor-Cali Status: offline
|
FR, after read thru Attending a munch is one thing, but play parties & other 'public' BDSM play is, to my mind, a whole other thing . . . . In the case of something like Down's syndrome the mental capacity issues are visible, & as Gypzy/Tantra pointed out not all mental capacity issues are similarly visible . . . . As someone who has hosted parties this issue, both at the extreme end of questions of capacity to consent (due to maturity, disability, intoxicants, etc) & the milder end of 'craziness' & inappropriate expectations & so on, are important issues to me . . . . . . I cannot & mostly do not want to get involved in people's private lives (I'm busy enough as it is, & I've not chosen that set of superpowers), but when it comes to the more 'public' face of BDSM & my part in that, I do feel somewhat proactive about the whole thing . . . . . . I embrace a 'screening' role in hosting parties, for instance. & I feel more comfortable knowing the hosts at any party I might attend also exercise diligence in screening party attendees . . . . It's a mark of how sincerely people take this issue that there aren't big public scandals about behaviors & outcomes from 'public' dungeons & private play parties (that I'm aware of; please post or send me links if you know of such) . . . . . When I was running parties I networked with our munch leader & other members of our community about who was appropriate to invite & who wasn't -- we have people who attend our munches who weren't getting invites to my parties because I ultimately judged & decided that there is a high probability that they wouldn't have enhanced the party &/or would've made others uncomfortable . . . . Attending a BDSM play party is most definitely a privilege, in my book, with pretty stringent rules of behavior. My preference is to err on the side of caution . . . . .
|