DemonKia
Posts: 5521
Joined: 10/13/2007 From: Chico, Nor-Cali Status: offline
|
FR, after read thru One thing I notice that complicates these kinds of discussions is conflating the choice with the person, ie, making a stupid choice does not necessarily mean a stupid person, making a crazy choice does not have to mean a crazy person . . . . . Sometimes the spot indicator is telling, sometimes it's not . . . . . . I try to avoid characterizing people by their choices, ie, I try to avoid calling people stupid, crazy, et alia, even when I feel like that is indicated by the evidence . . . . . & not just because of the above logic chain, but also because, in my mind, it creates a box in my head into which I'm then trying to stuff that person (from previous experience) . . . . . There's a Goethe quote that speaks to this: Treat people as if they were what they should be, and you help them become what they are capable of becoming. - Johannn von Goethe As to the main question of the OP, yeah, there is some level of inability to consent due to intelligence & emotional health at which BDSM interactions would squick me . . . . . Last year at Folsom I saw an s-type who clearly looked to have Down's syndrome, & I definitely felt squicky about it, as did the people I was with . . . . We did not interfere, but it has left a lingering set of questions in my mind . . . . . On the other hand, do I have a solution? Nope . .. . . All I can do is monitor & control what I can monitor & control; for instance, I've run parties in the past, & may in the future, & I would most likely keep out those who I had such concerns about . . . . .
_____________________________
Snarko ergo sum. The Verbossinator
|