MsHonor
Posts: 55
Joined: 8/15/2005 Status: offline
|
Yeah... I guess we all knew the use of the word "True" would bring out the fireworks. Really, I have to agree that it's probably your tone that has prevented anyone from firing any real rockets yet. See... "True" implies that somewhere, there's a "False". We all know there is a false. Plenty of "falses" right here on this site, and most any club meeting you might go to. But we don't admit it. It's much more politic to pretend that all ideas and philosophies are equally valid. But, even if you bend to that particular polite fantasy, the fact remains that some people are just wankers. It's a matter of nuance... What you mean when you say "true". Yes, I find a lot of people are in it for the kink... That's not any less "true", it's just not the whole of "my thing"... Not even the largest part of it. In my profile, I say I'm "Naturally Dominant", because I didn't have to make any special effort to learn it or persuade myself of it or "put on" the role... It's just who I am. I'm also careful to point out that there's not one thing wrong with anyone else seeking anything else that they and some theoretical partner find enjoyable about this big, messy, variegated, complex WIITWD thing. I felt I needed some way to inform potential submissives and slaves that it's not a game, an act, an intentionally learned behavior, a part time gig, or a hobby for me, but just how I am... So, "natural" is what I chose as my best choice. I'd say, just make it as clear as you can in your profile who and what you are... You'll still have to weed out good and bad matches like everyone else, but it should help. quote:
ORIGINAL: Diphon I tend to believe that all human behavior is learned. people aren't individually by nature, one way or the other. we're trained by our surroundings. you can take a puppy and teach it to be aggressive or to be docile. Humans are no differant. it's just a matter of how well trained and adjusted the individual. The debate on nature -vs- nurture goes on and on and on, of course... but I think your "nurture only" position is pretty easily shown as too narrow... To take the puppy example... Add a wolf pup to the mix. Although genetically nearly identical to what we used to call Canis Lupus Familiaris, before we had the genetic mojo to see that it just ain't so, you just won't ever end up with a domesticaed dog when starting from a pure wolf pup, no matter what nurture you use. Also, of course, it's very likely that the "nurture" part that makes a "naturally dominant personality" comes so early that it may as well be nature... I find myself endlessly curious about just how small a variable set, and just how early can effect these changes in behaviour, but short of some pretty unreasonably extensive experimentation, I doubt we'll have the answers any time soon.
|