|
julietsierra -> RE: Polite Society? (2/7/2008 12:55:57 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross Can we as a group of people who encourage and enjoy activities like peeing on each other and stabbing each other with needles really be referred to as "polite society?" God I hope not. If so, I signed up for the wrong cruise. [snip] ...I don't see any reason why my personal relationship orientation, and my kinky activities should have anything to do with being a polite mature person who can handle herself well in social situations. I have no problem with someone being an asshole, a cruel person who really gets off on hurting others and beating the crap out of them and making them cry and freezing them outside for an hour just to beat them some more and make them drive home immediately after- that WAS my ex owner and he's a great guy. I have a problem with someone doing those things in general company without a mutual understanding in place or using it as an excuse to act improperly in other social contexts. Being kinky or sadistic has no bearing on how people should act or react in nuetral social situations. Your thoughts? LA, this isn't to hijack at all. To me, it's kind of the same thing. Immediately before reading your post, I read this in an e-mail I received in a group I am part of: "I had to take a two day orientation class just to be able to volunteer at the hospital, so just to show you, that is how careful they are with who they allow in the hospital to volunteer. They also ran a criminal check to make sure I wasn’t some pervert! Imagine me doing this now, and them asking you all for references!" Now, I know the person who wrote this was being humorous, and perhaps he was just talking about how things would appear to people on the outside if they ever discovered this about him, but it just made me more than a bit uncomfortable. Why wouldn't I or many of the other people in that group be able to provide references for that person? We have different ideas about what should be personal things. It doesn't make us any less competent or responsible citizens. It doesn't mean we're not to be trusted, and it certainly doesn't mean that by virtue of our proclivities that we're necessarily going to fail a background check. And when I read your post, I thought exactly the same thing.. yes, there are probably impolite people everywhere, but that doesn't mean that by virtue of our proclivities, we're somehow less polite than the general population out there. It doesn't mean that our proclivities give us permission to be impolite as a general rule. And it certainly doesn't mean that our proclivities mean that we'd be a danger or give us persmission to be a danger to the rest of the world out there. I guess this is one of the things that has always bothered me about the perceptions folks in this lifestyle SEEM to have about themselves and the lifestyle they live. From what I've been able to see, and I've been around for about 10 years now, IN GENERAL, at least with the people I seem to associate with, (plus all the other disclaimers to generalizing you can come up with), people seem to strive to be more polite than I was used to before. Sure, there are always individuals out there who seem to have never been taught their manners, just as there are surely people floating around in this lifestyle that I wouldn't be able to give a positive reference for, but to simply say that we're all impolite, or lacking in morals simply because we choose to live our lives this way? I just don't see the connection. I know I live as if I have kind of a pollyanna-ish view of the world, but I kinda wish people would stop perpetuating this idea, even in fun, that by virtue of this lifestyle, we're somehow more of what society would consider us less for (more impolite, more amoral, more untrustworthy, etc). juliet
|
|
|
|