|
sirguym -> RE: Polite Society? (2/7/2008 3:05:52 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord We can't all get along, right? When values and principles vary, so will what's acceptable. I'm sure the range isn't only different, but much wider when you take your average kinkster versus, say, ultra-conversative Quaker guy. Still, as you've been apt in pointing out before, having a range which includes kinky area doesn't necessarily mean that such a range is unusually expansive. It's a long and complex subject. Any particular direction you wanted to go with it? As a side note, I'm of the elitest approach. Polite people are acceptable and allowed near; everyone else can live as they will, but they're not human in the same respect. I'm one who likes gated communities, both literally and metaphorically. Not that I necessarily think others are out to hurt me, but I just enjoy the freedom of not having to care. I just had to pick up on something there; I've known a lot of quakers in my time in UK politics; and as pacifists with a very highly developed social conscience and awareness, the last thing I'd call them is conservative! Yes, they profess a faith I can't share, but they've ditched all the mumbo-jumbo doctrine and dogma that brings hypocrisy and evil prejudice and misogyny into the heart of all other superstitions. I don't know how kinky they are in general, but I do know a few who were. Now, if you're talking about baptists, or some of the other non-mainstream protestant christian sects, yes, they are generally conservative, as are most inward looking small closed groups, though I have known some to be surprisingly radical, anti-establishment and open to new social insights. I look on manners as a code of conduct that evolved when life was nasty brutish and short, and just about everybody carried a sharp blade. Men at the top carried very long sharp swords, knew how to use them and had few compunctions about doing so. Those at the bottom carried concealed blades and survived by being ready and willing to use them if cornered. So everybody was very polite to everyone else, by a mutually agreed set of manners, comprising verbal rules and non-verbal body-language that conveyed the message that, 'I'm not a threat to you.' Because if they weren't they'd end up dead, disgraced or nastily disfigured, etc. Good manners is about not giving offence accidentally, without compromising your pride. So if I find your language and behaviour offensive, then I will remove myself from your company if I can if I can. (Though I will review my behaviour towards you just to consider if I have given reason for you to be offended). What I will not do it to lecture you on your bad manners - that to me would be very much worse! I consider you've every right to be rude to me; but if you are, you must accept the consequence - social isolation from me.
|
|
|
|