|
fairerthanshe -> RE: Polite Society? (2/7/2008 6:16:07 PM)
|
Greetings MadRabbit, I don't disagree with your assessment of the scene in general. One of the things that SJ and I regularly bring up is pushing the envelope in public play. We hear from other people about how penetration shouldn't be allowed at public parties, nor blood play, nor needle play, nor extreme breath play and yet we think just the opposite. We generally don't agree with 'mentoring' programs that teach people how to 'dom' as it creates cookie cutter scenes at each public party we attend. However, were we to address those who disagree with our view as stupid f**kin' used up saggy cunts in a public situation then we would be considered impolite and childish for calling names rather than behaving like adults. Discussing the matter at hand rather than resorting to name calling is kind of where this whole thing started... I was providing background information based on my knowledge of the situation which brought about the comments and therefore the thread. Wasn't trying to piss in your crumpets...[;)] well wishes ~ fairer than she quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote:
ORIGINAL: fairerthanshe Greetings MadRabbit, The topic which is being discussed has nothing to do with a particular kink. It is about someone being an impolite asshole in a social situation and interaction. That's not what I read at all. The question was posed that since the kink community encourages a huge number of deviant behaviors, then how can we be considered as "polite society"? "Polite society", in this context, is not solely about being an asshole, but rather where behaviors are restricted for the sake of "being appropriate". Hence, there is a time and a place for everything. Being an asshole is "inappropriate". Being naked in a restaurant is "inappropriate". Fucking your wife on the front lawn on a sunday afternoon is "inappropiate". Don't get me wrong. I am all about manners and decency and following the rules. But let's take a different social situation...a play party...which serves the purpose of allowing kinky people to be kinky around other kinky people. In that social context, if someone were to censor a kink for the sake of "polite society" or "appropriate behavior", isn't that in opposition to the mantra of "Your Kink Isn't My Kink, but your Kink is Ok". I'm not talking about "Please piss in the shower" type of censoring, but rather "No pissing at all at the party" or "No sexual intercourse at a party", BECAUSE it offends or disturbs people. I find it somewhat of a contradiction when someone says "Hey, your kink is ok and this is a play party where consenting adults can get kinky, but your kink is unfortanely disgusting and therefore, we can't have it at our party." In that sense, the notion of "polite society" is discouraging kink. Perhaps play parties should never happen for the sake of not offending anyone in "polite society". Everyone should just sit around, drink tea, eat crumpets, and talk about BDSM. I don't know. Somebody asked for thoughts and these are my thoughts on how the notion of "polite society" does have to be forgotten a bit if your going to create an enviroment where people can practice kink without intolerance and censorship.
|
|
|
|