RE: Emotional involvement and type of relationship.

RE: Emotional involvement and type of relationship. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

breatheasone -> RE: Emotional involvement and type of relationship. (1/30/2008 10:13:42 PM)
I really sense your frustration.... and you may think this is a cop out response but, what you seek IS out there...Someone is probably wondering at this very moment where you are, because you are exactly what they seek as well.....I hope that didn't sound too corny. I wish you well Sir.

Owner4SexSlave -> RE: Emotional involvement and type of relationship. (1/30/2008 10:40:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: batshalom quote: ORIGINAL: Owner4SexSlave A couple more crazy thoughts... the whole M/s dynamic if done right gives a deeper connection over a crazy half assed D/s relationship. Forgive me if I am misunderstanding ... but are you saying an M/s relationship is better / stronger / faster (the Six-Million Dollar Man version of relationships) compared to a D/s dynamic? If so, I have to tell you I've been in both and I've been in vanilla relationships in which the connections were all deep, none better than the others but all different. Perhaps your statement is true in your experience. Or, perhaps, I'm not getting what you're saying (entirely possible - been studying since 1:00 this afternoon and am fried). For me personally, I have found M/s relationships to be in fact deeper compared to more vanilla like D/s dynamics. I think I know the type of connection are you talking about though, and the type I am talking about are different things. The whole clarity of a Total Power Exchange... Grrr... I don't think you got what I intended to mean. In a TPE setting there is more clarity and the connection involved is deeper in terms of both the state of submission and being Dom. Non total power exchanges are prone to more head butting and cionfusion and issues. Grrr.. I still don't think you'd understand what I'm trying to express here. The words somewhat escape me... to clearly state this.

TemptingNviceSub -> RE: Emotional involvement and type of relationship. (1/31/2008 6:58:20 PM)
I would love to have a Master to serve, love, wash his socks, cook his meals, suck his cock dry as often as I can daily, kneel and do whatever... dress however... be sexy and whatever... and I want be His ONLY. That is a dream... And, I am seeing that, from what I am learning here, I am either very close-minded, or very vanilla with "lifestyle" tendancies. Perhaps I shall learn more about myself and my limitations or experiemntal curiosities when I am involved with someone who is Dom over me... but then, maybe not. Creatrix...I emboldened the above statement you wrote and wished to tell you that what you seek is what many seek..a monogamal dynamic..do not let any Dominant tell you that no Dominant anywhere does not want monogamy for that would be a lie...I have talked with many Dominants who also seek monogamy...2 only in their BDSM and their D/s dynamic..no third, no play with others simply 2.....stick with your dream it is not unobtainable..in fact it is not even that rare...[:)]..Tempting

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.015625