scarlettwitch
Posts: 18
Joined: 11/26/2007 From: North Carolina Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadisticBastid Hmm... a Dominant submissive... I don't know... I'm pretty sure that I'll be one of VERY few people who feels this way... specially in the day and age where everyone seems to think BDSM is nothing more than kinky sex LOL.... but I don't believe in Dominant submissives, or Submissive Dominants, or even switches LOL. If you're going to submit, then submit damn it... and if you're going to Dominate, then you better take responsibility for being a Dominant. If you're going to do something... give it your all.... How on earth can you say you are submitting completely to your Master, or Dom if you are trying to Dom someone else too? Who do your loyalties lie with? Serving your Master? or Guiding your submissive? Oh thats right... its not about guidance or responsabilty... its just about kinky sex... I forgot. But hey... in this day and age, a dominant seems to be nothing more than a guy who knows how to swing a flogger... or looks REAL good with that stupid florantine flogging, or figure 8 bullshit, or whatever else looks flashy. Its all about appearances, and absolutely nothing about substance. There was a day when you were expected to actually be responsible for your own life first, before you expected someone else to submit to you LOL... now all you have to do is have enough money to buy some toys LOL. Is it possible? Hell... people think being a submissive means the only time you're expected to submit is in the bedroom... so I guess anything is possible LOL That is precisely the sort of absolutist thinking and labeling that gets people confused and that I personally have no patience for. 1) There ARE no absolutes in BDSM anymore than there is in any other aspect of the human race except birth and death, and even birth can be fudged through the utilization of methods like IVF and surrogates; 2) no Virginia, BDSM is NOT merely all about the "kinky sex"; if that was all it was about, it wouldn't hold the interest of most people worth half their salt for very long; and 3) where was it written that You personally got to decide what everybody else can or should think, or feel, or how they should be defined in their personalities or "roles", or that sharing oneself in (or out of) role, even in more than one role, meant "divided loyalties" or that it was a Bad Thing? That, "Sir", was an insult and negation of every single person, regardless of role, whoever shared of themselves, their time, their love, their spirit, with more than one other person. Just because 1) You wouldn't do it Yourself, or 2) You dont claim to believe in it doesn't make it wrong or impossible, and does not in any way give You the right to say that anyone who shares in ways that You don't agree with is being irresponsible, disloyal, or is in need of "guidance". Oh yeah, I almost forgot - You were right about ONE thing: anything really is possible. Remember that, learn it, open Your heart to it, and You may become someone worth submitting to.. someday. And hey, guess what? I can not only take a joke, but *drum roll pls* I'm a dominant submissive (switch? yeah ok, maybe, but I really hate labels; I mostly prefer to be myself and not worry about it..), and I'm about as real as it gets. So there.
|