Zensee
Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aileen68 That only has the possiblity of working if an addict uses a clean needle every single time and then disposes of it properly afterwards. What are the odds of that happening? Do you think an addict is going to go to a clinic every time he or she needs a fix? Why bother having a fire department when some buildings are going to burn down anyway? What do you know yourself, about the odds of addicts using safe sites versus public toilets? You are just speculating. quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 quote:
ORIGINAL: philosophy ....and why, pray tell, is this a joke? Or is HIV/AIDS not worth preventing by any means possible? (edited to add it was a fast reply and not aimed at Pahunk) It appears the government has given up in helping these people kick the habit so instead they are taking on the philosophy that if you can't stop them, might as well make it "safe" for them. And this isn't pot we are talking about. We are talking about some very hardcore narcotics here. These drugs are not safe under any situation. These people need help, not encouragement. Your government gave up on helping people when it started its war on drugs and began warehousing addicts in penitentiaries. The punitive approach doesn't work, as the foray into alcohol prohibition should have taught the USA. Safe injection sites are places addicts can go, without fear of prosecution to A) reduce the harm of their addiction through access to unadulterated drugs and clean needles - B) have access to counselling, health care, detox and treatment. Trouble is, there are not enough detox and treatment beds available... lots of prison cells are available, of course. Z.
_____________________________
"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)
|