Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality types


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality types Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality types - 10/13/2007 11:13:00 AM   
kitttty


Posts: 494
Joined: 10/10/2007
Status: offline
So, I have heard the steryotype that male subs are often wall street honchos/CEOs/powerful men outside the bedroom and that is why they like to have someone else in control in the bedroom. I have no idea if this is true. I know only two male submissives and they do fit that bill.

I dont know what the steryotype for dominant men is. It seems that a high number of dominant men on this board look like creative types- photographers, musicians etc.

I have not the slightest clue what the 'norm' for submissive women is. I know one other submissive woman and she is a highly successful headcase. She is finishing her PhD, but she also is anorexic and a cutter and basically sort of crazy. Wait, I know another and she is married to a vanilla guy and has a Master on the side. Weird to me.

Obviously there are different sorts of all types of sexual personas, but are there norms?

Most people say that pracitioners of BDSM are more educated and of somewhat higher IQ than the general populace. My vanilla friends see BDSM as a sort of upper middle class escape from monotany.

DominaSmartass said this:

quote:

I personally don't know any slaves that would fit the description offered up by your prospective master. That doesn't mean they don't exist, and I think Daddysprop247 is along those lines and if she stumbles onto this thread I'm sure she'll be happy to elaborate. But for the most part, every slave I know is a decidely strong, loud, in charge, control-freak, etc. of a woman. I am referring specifically to female slaves because the males I know whom I'd actually consider slaves are quite different. But that's a whole other thread. I don't know any meek timid female slaves, most of the ones I know are successful in their careers and smart and their masters consider these traits positive attributes. Now, I think the real issue might be that he found himself falling in love, as you mentioned, and his behavior changed. This is a HUGE issue in and of itself as there is a great debate amongst Master/slave practitioners over whether it's even possible to maintain an M/s relationship with romantic love. Many believe it's not; many believe it is.


As for me, I was chronically unemployed (and employed as a receptionist or something else menial when I had a job) before the Master came to take care of my life. I was depressed and on anti-depressants, which made me listless. I was overweight and very disorganized and without any ambition whatsoever. The Master was somewhat repulsed by this, but fortunately instead of outright giving up on me, he stuck around to fix me. And now I am much happier because i am thin and fit, off meds, not depressed, i have a pretty interesting job with insurance and I will have a secure career path once I go to law school, which is something I never would think do without Master making me apply.

I also *only* am interested in dominant partners who are interested in romantic relationships. Men who eventually want to settle down and get married and have children and introduce their sub to others as their girlfriend/wife. Whenever I read a profile that describes how a Master is experienced and has collared 20 girls, it really makes me lose interest unless the profile also says he wants a romantic relationship. I only want partners who have no desire to go through 20 women if it can be avoided. Not that I look at profiles lately, but am I so unusual in the D/s world?

I had a former Master (very briefly) and he said that he did want to get married someday but that he would never marry a slave- only a someone he interacted with as an equal. That automatically ended the relationship for me.

I actually do think my lack of internal motivation is connected to my sexuality. I get out of bed because Master wants me to and if he did not care, I have a hard time caring as well. I can only be happy when I serve someone else as the center of my world. And I can only accomplish things when I am happy.

How unusual is this? That I only want romantic relationships and that I need Master in order to function otherwise?
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 11:23:09 AM   
InnocentYoungSub


Posts: 210
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline
I don't think its unusual or strange. If its what you want...

Personally I too see BDSM in a romantic light. My domme would also be my girlfriend.

And I'm not upper middle class or well educated(just a H.S. diploma..although I like to think I'm not stupid). I'm a scrubbie.


_____________________________

I live for.. I die for.. I breathe for..

(in reply to kitttty)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 11:26:58 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
All stereotypes have some truth behind them.

But generalities can only be useful when discussing general groups.  As soon as you begin talking about individuals, stereotypes and generalities become useless.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to InnocentYoungSub)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 11:32:59 AM   
pseudopsychotic


Posts: 145
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline

quote:

I actually do think my lack of internal motivation is connected to my sexuality. I get out of bed because Master wants me to and if he did not care, I have a hard time caring as well. I can only be happy when I serve someone else as the center of my world. And I can only accomplish things when I am happy.


Everyone needs areason to get out of bed in the moring.
Let's face facts and call aspade a spade.
Life sucks.
It's hard and gruling and you never really know left from right.
Life is also very fun, and beautiful.

You've now found the beauty in it, and good for you.

&& if it helps your stats at all.
I'm a single parent of two kids, a med student with high hopes of doing the doctors without borders thing.
I'm very pushy and mouthy in my "normal" life, becasue I know what I'm doing and I expect others to follow, or get out of my way.
And I'm a sub to a wonderful Dom. (Who actully does both business like stuff and writes on the side)


_____________________________

Got a problem with me Solve it.
Think I'm trippin? Tie my shoe
Can't face me? Turn around

(in reply to InnocentYoungSub)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 12:06:22 PM   
LATEXBABY64


Posts: 2107
Joined: 4/8/2004
Status: offline
it is all about lables you know. just do the right thing you do not do the right think kiss my hiny . the truth is this just be open honest about what you want. what you expect. do not expect people to guess

(in reply to pseudopsychotic)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 12:31:03 PM   
DarkDaddyZ


Posts: 805
Joined: 4/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

All stereotypes have some truth behind them.

But generalities can only be useful when discussing general groups.  As soon as you begin talking about individuals, stereotypes and generalities become useless.

I agree that there is truth to all stereotypes having some truth.  The problem is that in many stereotypes (like BDSM) some take what's percieved as the negative (or a very small part) and run with it and make that what people concentrate on.

_____________________________

"Flirting is part of the job description." DJ Jesus (Lucy Daughter Of The Devil)

Vanilla Official Music Page http://www.myspace.com/djzulu

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 12:31:37 PM   
Missokyst


Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

So, I have heard the steryotype that male subs are often wall street honchos/CEOs/powerful men outside the bedroom and that is why they like to have someone else in control in the bedroom. I have no idea if this is true. I know only two male submissives and they do fit that bill.

I see a lot of men saying that, however there are so few people of either sex which would fall into the description of corporate leader.  Most of the sub males I know are just average people, not the boss, not in charge, and with no obvious reason to proclaim themselves needing a break from the weight of being in charge.  It just seems to be rationalization to me.

I dont know what the steryotype for dominant men is. It seems that a high number of dominant men on this board look like creative types- photographers, musicians etc.

I think you will find many, maybe even most people who post to boards are creative (they like to write), relatively educated people.  But it is safe to say that there are many more people doing this who never write about it.

I have not the slightest clue what the 'norm' for submissive women is. I know one other submissive woman and she is a highly successful headcase. She is finishing her PhD, but she also is anorexic and a cutter and basically sort of crazy. Wait, I know another and she is married to a vanilla guy and has a Master on the side. Weird to me.

Well, I for one am twisted.  I know I have issues and if I did not, I probably wouldn't be masochistic.  I am a cutter who has that in control, I was a bulimic early in my life but that is over and done.. along with disco's.  Most people however, would be shocked to find that out about me.  I look normal, I have no visible scars, I don't act nuts.  If anything people see me AS a dominant.  More often than not they trust me to run things and do it well. 

Obviously there are different sorts of all types of sexual personas, but are there norms?

Most people say that pracitioners of BDSM are more educated and of somewhat higher IQ than the general populace. My vanilla friends see BDSM as a sort of upper middle class escape from monotany.

I am educated with a higher than normal IQ and almost upper middle class after years of bouncing around looking for something that suits me.  BUT, I can tell you I know a lot of people who do this that do not fit that mold, in fact I probably know more who do not.

DominaSmartass said this:

quote:

I personally don't know any slaves that would fit the description offered up by your prospective master. That doesn't mean they don't exist, and I think Daddysprop247 is along those lines and if she stumbles onto this thread I'm sure she'll be happy to elaborate. But for the most part, every slave I know is a decidely strong, loud, in charge, control-freak, etc. of a woman. I am referring specifically to female slaves because the males I know whom I'd actually consider slaves are quite different. But that's a whole other thread. I don't know any meek timid female slaves, most of the ones I know are successful in their careers and smart and their masters consider these traits positive attributes. Now, I think the real issue might be that he found himself falling in love, as you mentioned, and his behavior changed. This is a HUGE issue in and of itself as there is a great debate amongst Master/slave practitioners over whether it's even possible to maintain an M/s relationship with romantic love. Many believe it's not; many believe it is.


As for me, I was chronically unemployed (and employed as a receptionist or something else menial when I had a job) before the Master came to take care of my life. I was depressed and on anti-depressants, which made me listless. I was overweight and very disorganized and without any ambition whatsoever. The Master was somewhat repulsed by this, but fortunately instead of outright giving up on me, he stuck around to fix me. And now I am much happier because i am thin and fit, off meds, not depressed, i have a pretty interesting job with insurance and I will have a secure career path once I go to law school, which is something I never would think do without Master making me apply.

My current direction is a result of a very wonderful man who showed me I can succeed in anything I try.  I just have to want it.  Before he came into my life I had many directions and no destination in mind.  Without him in my life I often think "what next?"  Fear of success is my biggest demon and one I have found can be defeated when I have someone in my corner.  It is much more difficult to do that on my own.  This is probably why I have chosen dominant, nurturing, men in my life.

I also *only* am interested in dominant partners who are interested in romantic relationships. Men who eventually want to settle down and get married and have children and introduce their sub to others as their girlfriend/wife. Whenever I read a profile that describes how a Master is experienced and has collared 20 girls, it really makes me lose interest unless the profile also says he wants a romantic relationship. I only want partners who have no desire to go through 20 women if it can be avoided. Not that I look at profiles lately, but am I so unusual in the D/s world?

I have to agree with you there.  Having had few partners in my life, those I chose were more likely to stick with long term relationships.  When I see men who have had 20+ partners I see a player out for trophies.  Not my type at all.

I had a former Master (very briefly) and he said that he did want to get married someday but that he would never marry a slave- only a someone he interacted with as an equal. That automatically ended the relationship for me.

I actually do think my lack of internal motivation is connected to my sexuality. I get out of bed because Master wants me to and if he did not care, I have a hard time caring as well. I can only be happy when I serve someone else as the center of my world. And I can only accomplish things when I am happy.

How unusual is this? That I only want romantic relationships and that I need Master in order to function otherwise?

I have always assumed that this is a guilt issue more than anything.  Maybe we are afraid to want.  Maybe we are afraid to succeed.  Maybe we fear that if we have what we want we might lose it and so why try?  But when you are with someone, and he can be anyone who is important to us, nilla, bdsm, master, whatever.. if they are important to us, we want to accomplish more.  Because we have taken the "ME ME ME" out of the plan, and inserted "It is for him that I do this", and it becomes doing good for another.  Success, but success FOR someone else.  I don't know.  I have thought alot about this since my breakup.  For him I would have helped build his business, worked long and hard to make his life better.  And now that he is just my boss, I have a sort of apathy about making myself succeed.


_____________________________

pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses your understanding ~Gibran, Kahlil

“The truth is, everyone is going to hurt you. You just got to find the ones worth suffering for.”
― Bob Marley


(in reply to kitttty)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 12:45:45 PM   
DMFParadox


Posts: 1405
Joined: 9/11/2007
Status: offline
Wow, Missokyst.  I have only one thing to add to that scintillating post... despite what Dominasmartass says, not all slave women are control freaks with solid careers. Some of them are 'normal' in their relations at work and with friends--normal being defined fairly loosely, there--and some of them are out-of-control, spiralling downward messes.  The slaves that get into effective relationships with a master are usually the ones that have a little bit of skill in organization, at least; this level of play requires some preparation and planning from all parties.  But it's a trend, not a certainty.

_____________________________

bloody hell, get me some aspirin and a whiskey straight

"The role of gender in society is the most complicated thing I’ve ever spent a lot of time learning about, and I’ve spent a lot of time learning about quantum mechanics." - Randall Munroe

(in reply to Missokyst)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 1:07:29 PM   
sambamanslilgirl


Posts: 10926
Joined: 2/5/2007
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

I dont know what the steryotype for dominant men is. It seems that a high number of dominant men on this board look like creative types- photographers, musicians etc.

Daddy is a successful psychiatrist with a private pratice meanwhile my SO does fit your stereotypical theory - he's a writer and cartoonist.

quote:

I have not the slightest clue what the 'norm' for submissive women is.

i think you're looking for the one and only definition of a twue submissive. please, for the love that is ALL holy - stop!  there is NO "norm" for submissive women. i'm radio personality who writes band/music reviews as well as sings in a band - very successful in my career. yet there are other qualities about me that make me submissive just as there are qualities that make you who you are to your other. however there's no "twue" or "norm" for submissive women because you cannot categorize every one of us into ONE single definition.


_____________________________

...2011 - year of the fabulous rock star life ...and i do it so well...


...announcing Mr. & Mrs. British Petrol ...yeah, marrying into oil is slick business...

(in reply to kitttty)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 1:51:11 PM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
Is there truly a DominaSmartass?  I am enchanted!

In my experience, the scene is full of folks of all makes and models.  I've met PhDs and functional illiterates, company presidents, and professional moochers.  And yes, I have met some who fit the "stereotype" of exec wanting a "break".  I think they are the ones most disappointed my encountering a  femdom, since they are just exchanging one kind of service for another!  



_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to sambamanslilgirl)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 1:56:54 PM   
RRafe


Posts: 2060
Joined: 8/29/2007
Status: offline
I tend to not pay attention to sterotypes. Too limiting to my perception-I go on a case by case basis.

_____________________________

I seem to be some wierd combination of Ren and Stimpy

(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 2:00:18 PM   
Sexynmentalinkc


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/14/2006
Status: offline
With regard to "norms", I always refer to the following:


"The only 'normal' people are the ones you don't know very well." ~ Joe Ancis (contemporary of Lennie Bruce)



* tips his hat *

- Mr. S


_____________________________

"I think all right-thinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told that ordinary, decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. ...I'm certainly not. And I'm sick and tired of being told that I am..."

(in reply to RRafe)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 2:04:02 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

All stereotypes have some truth behind them.

But generalities can only be useful when discussing general groups.  As soon as you begin talking about individuals, stereotypes and generalities become useless.


If you got a dollar for every time you were right, you'd have some bucks.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 5:23:11 PM   
DominaSmartass


Posts: 961
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: This month? Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

Is there truly a DominaSmartass?  I am enchanted!


Haha, yes, here I am. And I want to reply to this thread in full but don't have time at this moment. So I'll be back.

_____________________________

“These S&M people ... they are bossy! There’s also a creepy connection between leather sex, ‘Star Trek’ and the Renaissance Faire.”

- Comedian Margaret Cho

(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 6:02:29 PM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
ditto on what LA said.

I am a professional and every male sub I've had any interest in was in some manner as well, and don't necessarily fit the bill as the "meek personality types", but then again, I'm not attracted to that as much.  As a sub, I've been with Doms that had no job to wonderful jobs.  Stereotypes about personality, wealth, success or lack thereof are meaningless and irrelevant to me as long as they don't affect the abillity to have a relationship and communicate.
l

(in reply to DominaSmartass)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 6:27:06 PM   
imtempting


Posts: 1280
Joined: 2/11/2005
Status: offline
Im kindergarten (or year 1) at school I believed I could get herbies and girl germs from just holding hands with girls. I thought this because it is what I was told by people I knew. I later found out this to be very false. The lifestyle is full of these fake beliefs. Not everything is what it appears.



(in reply to kitttty)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 9:07:27 PM   
DominaSmartass


Posts: 961
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: This month? Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

So, I have heard the steryotype that male subs are often wall street honchos/CEOs/powerful men outside the bedroom and that is why they like to have someone else in control in the bedroom. I have no idea if this is true. I know only two male submissives and they do fit that bill.


I know a number of male subs who do fit that to some extent (not really CEOs or anything but pretty successful guys with stressful jobs) but I also know plenty of sub males who are uneducated, working dead end jobs, unemployed...Come to think of it, I know female subs who are at both ends of the spectrum as well. The thing is, I know many more female subs *in real life* who are very successful women in the tradiational sense (education, jobs, social status) but who choose to submit to one man mostly within their personal/sex lives. This is in comparison to female subs like yourself according to how you have described yourself. I probably know of a few, as I'm sure they're out there, but I can't think of anyone specifically who was squandering her life away before a man came and took ownership of her.

quote:


I dont know what the steryotype for dominant men is. It seems that a high number of dominant men on this board look like creative types- photographers, musicians etc.


I'm not sure there is a stereotype for dom men but most of the ones I know are self-employed or in some sort of profession like Lawyer, Doctor, Nurse, etc. Submissive men tend to be IT/computer related professions and accountants, just from the sheer numbers I've met. Then again, I've met plenty of submissive lawyers. I'm sure there is no rule, but as LA already pointed out and I was going to say anyway, stereotypes are usually based on at least a grain of truth somewhere.

quote:


I have not the slightest clue what the 'norm' for submissive women is. I know one other submissive woman and she is a highly successful headcase. She is finishing her PhD, but she also is anorexic and a cutter and basically sort of crazy. Wait, I know another and she is married to a vanilla guy and has a Master on the side. Weird to me.


I would definitely say that the stereotype for sub women is that of the independant and successful career-woman who is also submissive to her lover/husband. And though this is the stereotype, and I have seen a lot of cases like this personally, I'd never go as far as to say it's the norm. Just that it's pretty common. It's hard to talk in terms of norms when we are already so far outside the bell curve of what's normal to begin with.

quote:


Most people say that pracitioners of BDSM are more educated and of somewhat higher IQ than the general populace. My vanilla friends see BDSM as a sort of upper middle class escape from monotany.


I don't know about that one. I've met some pretty idiotic, bottom of the barrel, "help! the gene pool needs some chlorine" folks through bdsm. I've also met some of the best people I know, but still it averages out. I can sort of see how bdsm can be seen by some as an upper middle class escape because upper/upper middle class people tend to be fairly well educated which can lead to open mindedness, liberalism, and willingness to explore different things within a relationship. I'm not saying that these are prerequisites for practicing bdsm, just that it helps. Plus people are more able to go after fulfilling sex lives and relationship when they are doing ok for themselves, not living in poverty.

quote:


DominaSmartass said this:

quote:

I personally don't know any slaves that would fit the description offered up by your prospective master. That doesn't mean they don't exist, and I think Daddysprop247 is along those lines and if she stumbles onto this thread I'm sure she'll be happy to elaborate. But for the most part, every slave I know is a decidely strong, loud, in charge, control-freak, etc. of a woman. I am referring specifically to female slaves because the males I know whom I'd actually consider slaves are quite different. But that's a whole other thread. I don't know any meek timid female slaves, most of the ones I know are successful in their careers and smart and their masters consider these traits positive attributes. Now, I think the real issue might be that he found himself falling in love, as you mentioned, and his behavior changed. This is a HUGE issue in and of itself as there is a great debate amongst Master/slave practitioners over whether it's even possible to maintain an M/s relationship with romantic love. Many believe it's not; many believe it is.



As for me, I was chronically unemployed (and employed as a receptionist or something else menial when I had a job) before the Master came to take care of my life. I was depressed and on anti-depressants, which made me listless. I was overweight and very disorganized and without any ambition whatsoever. The Master was somewhat repulsed by this, but fortunately instead of outright giving up on me, he stuck around to fix me. And now I am much happier because i am thin and fit, off meds, not depressed, i have a pretty interesting job with insurance and I will have a secure career path once I go to law school, which is something I never would think do without Master making me apply.


I have to say, congratulations on what you have acheieved and will be acheiving and obviously your Master is owed a lot of credit. I have met submissive boys (and I say this due to their age more than anything) whose lives were in total shambles. They were looking for someone to come put them back together, help them get into school or a job, and take ownership of them...or so they said. One such situation recently ended VERY badly for a Domme friend of mine who found herself thoroughly taken advantage of (financially and otherwise) by a 24 year old kid who convinced her he wanted to be her slave. I'm not generalizing and I say kudos to people who find a partner to really inspire the best in them but overall, my belief is that we need to come into a relationship, bdsm one or otherwise, as healthy functioning adults. While the idea of finding someone who is broken and building him up into someone I want him - and he wants- to be is appealing, I have seen the reality and it doesn't always turn out pretty. All I can say is that if this is the case for you, obviously you went into it with the best intentions and a pure heart (as did your Master) and you were not looking to take advantage of someone. Unfortunately, that is not what happens 100% of the time.

quote:


I also *only* am interested in dominant partners who are interested in romantic relationships. Men who eventually want to settle down and get married and have children and introduce their sub to others as their girlfriend/wife. Whenever I read a profile that describes how a Master is experienced and has collared 20 girls, it really makes me lose interest unless the profile also says he wants a romantic relationship. I only want partners who have no desire to go through 20 women if it can be avoided. Not that I look at profiles lately, but am I so unusual in the D/s world?


I don't think that's abnormal or asking too much at all. I was always looking for my primary relationship and my D/s one to be one and the same. It may not have turned out that way (only time will tell in my case) but I love what I have and maybe there will be someone else to add in the future but who knows. At the moment he is standing in front of me holding a cockring and a few dozen feet of rope so I'd really better get off the computer, lol!

Hopefully I've added some insight, or whatever ;)


_____________________________

“These S&M people ... they are bossy! There’s also a creepy connection between leather sex, ‘Star Trek’ and the Renaissance Faire.”

- Comedian Margaret Cho

(in reply to kitttty)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 10:16:33 PM   
chiaThePet


Posts: 2694
Joined: 2/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imtempting

Im kindergarten (or year 1) at school I believed I could get herbies and girl germs from just holding hands with girls. I thought this because it is what I was told by people I knew. I later found out this to be very false. The lifestyle is full of these fake beliefs. Not everything is what it appears.





"Herbies", no, that would be stereotyping for sure.

"Girl germs" on the other hand, has been a common malady since time began.

chia* (the pet)

_____________________________

Love is a many splendid sting.

You can stick me in the corner, but I'll probably just end up coloring on the walls.

(in reply to imtempting)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/13/2007 11:48:26 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Level
If you got a dollar for every time you were right, you'd have some bucks.


:) Thanks, and if I gave you a dollar for every time you said something right before I did, you'd have a chunk of cash yourself.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality... - 10/14/2007 7:13:37 AM   
therealboss


Posts: 227
Joined: 9/11/2007
Status: offline
why don't you come and kiss my arse and see what type you are?

_____________________________

be the best

(in reply to kitttty)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Is there truth to steryotypical Dom/sub personality types Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156