|
LadyPact -> RE: D/s and vanilla? (10/1/2007 6:54:28 AM)
|
I can tell you that it is very reasonable for some. Case in point, I have a husband. I also have a submissive. My husband is starting to like kink more, but he is of a Dominant nature. At this time, I think the best definition would be beginner Top, as he's had a couple of casual play opportunities, but hasn't moved to having his own submissive. Even with Our interest in kink, My husband and I have the vanilla relationship. There is no D/s at home. (My submissive doesn't live under Our roof.) For My kink, I have My submissive. That is the area where the Sadist/masochist relationship is. The service, such as pedicures and what not comes in. There are vanilla activities included there, but not the romance, etc. As Lucky said, it does fall under what I consider poly, but My definition isn't everyone's. My point being that some of Us can, and do live with these types of arrangements. Again, to agree with her, it does work better when everyone is aware of the relationships that you are involved with and with whom. Around here, folks just call U/us the "P" family now. Edited to add a flick of a space bar. Guess I was just too busy smiling to type it right the first time.
|
|
|
|