CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SirDominic We as a community are so unwilling to define ourselves, that a vacuum is left. If we won't define what our lifestyle is, those who don't understand us will. Namaste, Sir Dominic You make an excellent point but look at the difficulty of defining ourselves. There are many who understand what S.S.C. and RACK are really meant to cover...the intricacies and not just the basics of the two concepts. But just how many here in this forum alone have expressed a problem of some sort with either concept? Now multiply that by the number of people who participate in D/s BDSM but who do not participate in these forums but belong to this site. Now add in a few more from those who belong to sites like Chatro or Alt.com or etc., etc.. Finally, add in a few who've never belonged to any site on the net. How many people now do you have that participate in D/s BDSM, who have at the very least disdain for the precepts of S.S.C. or RACK, express those feelings openly and then wonder why those who "don't get D/s BDSM" look askance when those who DO believe in the concept of S. S. C. and RACK point to those as a "governing" measure of our "play". As already noted, who within D/s BDSM is going to be allowed to define us and who could do so in such a way that would include definitions of D/s and BDSM that would satisfy the great majority of practitioners but not all? We've seen that happen on these boards too. Some play in such a manner that it is considered too "mild" by "serious" players. Some play at a level considered "too" out there by others. And yet, both may be playing within an accepted scope...but what about those who are not within that scope at either extreme? Can anyone deny that many times, when someone speaks up and tells a submissive or a dominant that their style is not only extreme but dangerous, that many will tell the "offending" person that he/she has no right to be judgemental about another's relationship/play/attitude? Sorry if this offends some...but it seems to me that to speak up and state that something is wrong or abusive on here generally results in this...even when most people are saying to themselves with that little, niggling voice of conscience "that is not D/s, that is abuse." Let's face it...though the percentage is, hopefully, much smaller than the number of loving M/s couples like Mercnbeth... there is bound to be M/s or D/s couples wherein the dynamic is called D/s by the participants and even defended, though not necessarily agreed with, as such when the truth of the matter is that the relationship dynamic is skewed towards abusive domineering and beaten-down, abject acceptance. But to speak up against such a relationship being labeled as D/s might result in statements of "Who are you to judge?" or "Non-accepting of a style different than your own". And, to be fair, in some cases the detractors would be right...for there are many extreme couples who do practice extreme D/s and/or extreme BDSM that can seem abusive on the surface but when examined critically fits within the concepts. BUT...there are those who don't but who skate by on the fear of many of being labeled "politically incorrect" or "non-tolerant" or "judgmental".
|