The New US One Party System Of Government

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

The New US One Party System Of Government - The Republicrat

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> The New US One Party System Of Government - The Republicrat

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

The New US One Party System Of Government - The Republi... - 3/18/2007 9:15:55 PM

Real0ne

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

Republicrat Corporate Fascism
And Voting Our Conscience

Of course there is so little difference between the 2 major parties this really doesn't matter all that much. The corporations have had every politician in both the Republican and Democratic Parties bought and paid for a long time ago. They are the Republicrat Party, all lying puppets cast by the corporate oligarchy. The sooner the people of the United States understand this very simple fact, the faster Third Parties like the Green Party will grow strong and become a formidable threat to the status quo. Only then will the 49% who didn't see fit to come out and vote in the 2000 presidential race finally see a reason to come out and vote their conscience. Only then will we start to vote our conscience and vote for someone who is actually out for the good of all 285 million citizens of the United States, and the 6.1 billion people who now share this Earth. Only then will we start to vote our conscience and vote for someone who fully understands that we must quickly change over to sustainable environmental policies, to leave our children a habitable Earth. Only then will we have someone who is not bought and paid for by the corporations, but finally, a truly honest person of integrity. Only then will we vote our conscience and vote for someone like Ralph Nader to win back the Presidency for all Americans. Finally putting a stop to our corporate fascism, and bring democracy back to this Republic.
http://www.republicrat.net/

Now dont that say it all! The reason they say the green party is because it to the best of my knowledge is the only other party that is eligible for funding based on support, everyone else has to get their own money for champaigns

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/18/2007 10:04:56 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: The New US One Party System Of Government - The Rep... - 3/18/2007 10:44:27 PM

popeye1250

Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

Well, with all the Republicans jumping ship and signing up in the Constitution Party I think they'll be elegable for funding soon too.
That must make Bush real happy eh?
I don't think those Republicans "left" the Party, I think the Party left them.

(in reply to Real0ne)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: The New US One Party System Of Government - The Rep... - 3/19/2007 5:25:28 AM

petdave

Posts: 2479
Status: offline

The Reform Party had a pretty respectable chunk of federal campaign funds after Perot... didn't do them much good, tho.
The Libertarian Party will not accept federal funds for campaigning.
We broke 300M people last year... time to update the ol' website.

(in reply to popeye1250)

Profile

Post #: 3

RE: The New US One Party System Of Government - The Rep... - 3/19/2007 5:48:07 AM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

I liked clinton. but he did sign nafta and allowed china MFN staus. both now biting us in teh azz.

(in reply to petdave)

Profile

Post #: 4

RE: The New US One Party System Of Government - The Rep... - 3/19/2007 7:35:31 AM

NorthernGent

Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline

Good post, Real0ne. It certainly resonates here. Since 1997, a vote for either of the two main political parties is a vote for big business. Effective disenfranchisement, what democracy. I agree, the only way to change this is to form a political movement with actual politics at the heart of the movement rather than bribes and business pay-offs.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Real0ne)

Profile

Post #: 5

RE: The New US One Party System Of Government - The Rep... - 3/19/2007 8:03:51 AM

meatcleaver

Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

Good post, Real0ne. It certainly resonates here. Since 1997, a vote for either of the two main political parties is a vote for big business. Effective disenfranchisement, what democracy. I agree, the only way to change this is to form a political movement with actual politics at the heart of the movement rather than bribes and business pay-offs.

The old Labour Party was deeply flawed but at least its existence meant that Britain was a functioning democracy. Sadly it seems dead a doornail now and any new movement will be built on completely different foundations but what?

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to NorthernGent)

Profile

Post #: 6

RE: The New US One Party System Of Government - The Rep... - 3/19/2007 8:25:14 AM

ferryman777

Posts: 198
Joined: 2/23/2007
Status: offline

So, I followed this GATT/NAFTA thing.....at the post office there were petitioners, asking for sigs against the two bills, page after page with signatures. Bushsr. wanted it, pushed for it. On the radio, it was top news......now, Bush sr. pushed this legistration through, right up to the final days, of the final week, of his reign, hand carried the papers; it passed.....then came Clinton who had to sign, to make it official. Yet Clinton bares the blame for it all.

When I mention Reagan folly, I am reminded there was a Dem house, and he is excused the folly. When I mention Clinton folly, I am always supported and Clinton is Alway the culprit, never excused, never acknowledged he was subject to a GOP house.

When I mention Bush Folly, .......nothing, simply nothing. All is acceptible.

How can I understand this? I am not a Clinton supporter, BTW.

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 7