LadyHugs
Posts: 2299
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
Dear Celeste43, Ladies and Gentlemen; Having only addressed 'in house' protocols and or rules and in BDSM friendly enviorment 'protocols and or rules'; you have added what your views are on work enviorment situations. To address that area; communications are extremely important, as well as a recognition that regardless of their status with a Master, Mistress, Dominant and the like; a slave and or submissive must be assured that minimum intrusions by the Owner, Master, Mistress, Dominant and or other title(s) by them while engaged in their place of employment and or during their employment. Absent is seen the area of 'trust' involved, when stating that a Dominant cannot enforce dressing protocols and or acting as a chaperone. Perhaps there are some Dominants that over micro-manage their slaves/submissives. I rather have a practical approach. Even practical approaches can be deemed 'strict.' For example, taking my first slave michael being in the military. Choice of attire was not my choice at all but, required due to his job. I still required a protocol while he was at work, using his job's 'uniform of the day' as the protocol. He left our premise in the 'uniform of the day' and came home the same way. True, it was US Government military dress code but, I made sure he was dressed accordingly. I didn't make a big deal with it but, we used it as a line between work and home to detach from slave mode into his military officer mode. When coming home, there was a detachment of military officer back into slave mode. It worked for us--our protocols, rituals and the communication and trust that was special between us. I didn't call my slave at work. He called me. When I was working, he didn't call me. I called home when he got there. In summary, there are times or 'windows' where there can be a strict Dominant and obedient slave. In relationships as well as situations, it requires flexibilities, requires trust, requires communication, requires understanding and compassion, as well as listening to the other person as to how best to create protocols and or the boundaries, rules and such which may appear 'strict' by other's measures--which works for the individuals involved. I wish I could say that people use common sense when it deals with M/s and or D/s outside the living quarters, privacy of home and hearth, dungeons and dining rooms. The only authority I can realize is when I am in actual control of the slave, given in certain circumstances and or situations. Work and or distant separation, I must depend on trust and commitment by the slave. Cyberland--well, I don't do cyber. I use the PC as a communication tool/aid. Respectfully submitted for consideration, Lady Hugs
|