Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


juliaoceania -> Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 5:29:42 AM)

There was a question asked a while back that never got a proper answer from my perspective, and that is this:

For those of us "s" types, do you think that your masochism interferes your submissiveness? Do you worry that getting a masochistic fix will become your primary motivation for your submission?

For dominant types, have you noticed a difference between masochist submissives and non masochistic submissives when it comes to the motivations for their submissiveness, just in your experience of course.

I consider myself masochistic, I enjoy pain sometimes just for the sake of it. I used to worry that this would become my motivation for my submissiveness when I first began exploring this part of myself. I no longer worry about that for me personally, it is not my primary motivation, it does not interefere with my submissiveness whatsoever. I can see where it might begin to, if getting that "fix" became more important than doing what I was told, etc. I was wondering what other people's experiences in this regard are.




Sinergy -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 5:37:41 AM)

Hello,

I was talking to somebody (submissive) once who told me that she needed to be played with because when too much time went by between floggings she tended to get (to use her words) uppity and argumentative.

She was not in a relationship, but I got the distinct impression that in a relationship she would be one of those
who thinks of a Dominant as a life support system for a flogger.  One example does not prove or disprove an argument, of course.

Just me, could be wrong, but there ya go.

Sinergy




SweetSarijane -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 6:01:16 AM)

I think it can for some. It depends on the person. It doesn't for me. My submissive needs are, so far, separate from my masochistic needs. S/m play doesn't really satisfy me as a submissive, only as a masochist. Service of some kind, helping do things, doing things for others is what satisfies the submissive needs in me. I need to give to those who I care about and respect and call friend. In caring for and giving to my family and those I call friend, I find fulfillment and happiness. I'm one of those who to a degree will compartmentalize certain aspects of my life.

edited for 2 commas....need coffee.....




becca333 -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 6:03:28 AM)

See, now I've got a whole new set of things to worry about.  Maybe the best rule is to just go ahead and do whatever works for whoever's in the relationship, and not over-analyse it.  (Don't you love the word 'analyse'?  Ok, maybe that's just me.)

We change over time, and so do our relationships.  If everyone involved is fulfilled, or at least is getting their jollies, (which most people see as the same thing), then whatever's happening is successful, at least for now.




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 7:11:22 AM)

No, but I do know a lot of masochists feel pressure to ALSO be submissive when I think they'd be much happier to just call themselves masochistic princesses.




KnightofMists -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 7:34:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

For dominant types, have you noticed a difference between masochist submissives and non masochistic submissives when it comes to the motivations for their submissiveness, just in your experience of course.



um... NO




Missokyst -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 9:36:43 AM)

I don't find it interferes at all.  I am very much a masochist, have been all my life.  But I am submissive, only within a relationship.  Over the years I have played to indulge the maso side.  Or even satisfied the maso urge on my own.  But when I am with someone I want to cater to, I become more submissive than maso.  I can play with my mate as a maso, and enjoy it, but I don't crave it as much since I am happy that the sub need is being met.
For me, maso is a beast, held at bay by happiness.
I still enjoy maso play in a relationship, but it becomes more for his benefit than mine.
Wow that is difficult to describe.
Kyst




Devilslilsister -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 9:55:41 AM)

Well i love pain, i hate pain.  I crave it, i try and escape it.  i dont find it interfers with anything.  Except for the pure fact of enjoying the pain once it comes.

I find it simple enough to ask for pain from Master (which he loves to give) and in a day or two beg that i didnt know what i was thinking when i asked.   As well, Master can always tell if i need a good "spanking" and usually doles it. 

i could use a really really really really good whupping, right now.  Master also agree's i could use one.  I'm craving it, i need it, as does Master.  i WANT my ass BEAT.  He took a ruler to it and i looked at Master and said "wow - i thought rulers would hurt more" 

Will it affect the submission?  Doubtful.  Though i will probably act like a smart ass abit more to instigate one.  i will probably try and think up a variety of ways to instigate one.  I've already tried convincing Master that it is "A- ok" to give me a sound spanking. 

Yet, while i might randomly try and instigate, be sneaky, and maybe abit conniving to get what i want - i dont see it affecting my submission.  On the whole, i'm better behaved then i usually am. 




Fawne -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 1:33:23 PM)

Hi -

Well, I need "s" to need "m". Works as a whole. Synergistically; if you will.

Others, can go out - 'scene' - get their fix - release- enjoy and a fine time was had by all ;)
My respect to everyone.

I've tried that - just a little bit- and I find it empty.  

Quote: " a life support system with a flogger" ?   .... Never for me. 

love to all





velvetears -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 1:39:28 PM)

i wouldn't want my submission to be without any expression for my masochism.  They are linked for me, and i would not want to change that either.




TopinPa -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 2:05:50 PM)

I guess like others have said here it's different for different people but me personally; I'm currently single and am interested in finding a l/t relationship so to make that work a woman would have to be very much of a masochist and I think being submissive would just complement that. I really don't see how a woman could submit herself totally without being submissive.
But that's just me [:)]




tangldupinblue -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 2:09:20 PM)

i let Daddy control them both, he knows me well enough to know when i'm doing something just to get his attention and hes good enough to know to use on for the others benifits




Noah -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 2:16:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

There was a question asked a while back that never got a proper answer from my perspective, and that is this:

For those of us "s" types, do you think that your masochism interferes your submissiveness? Do you worry that getting a masochistic fix will become your primary motivation for your submission?

For dominant types, have you noticed a difference between masochist submissives and non masochistic submissives when it comes to the motivations for their submissiveness, just in your experience of course.

I consider myself masochistic, I enjoy pain sometimes just for the sake of it. I used to worry that this would become my motivation for my submissiveness when I first began exploring this part of myself. I no longer worry about that for me personally, it is not my primary motivation, it does not interefere with my submissiveness whatsoever. I can see where it might begin to, if getting that "fix" became more important than doing what I was told, etc. I was wondering what other people's experiences in this regard are.



I don't invest much time in analyzing motivations. As a matter of  fact I think that most of what people offer as accounts of their motivations can be dispensed with in the sense that I don't believe we know why we do things, quite generally.

You went to the store.  Why?  To get milk?  But why that store? Closest? Cheapest? Why do you prefer closest or cheapest? Or indeed why did you choose closest and/or cheapest despite "preferring" friendliest or trendiest, or greenest?  And why milk?  For pancakes. Why pancakes? Did your grandma make you pancakes the morning of the day she died, and in your trauma had you displaced that memory from your conscious mind but does it still impinge somehow? 

NOW do we know why you went to the store?  Frankly, I doubt it. The thing is that I told you last week to tend to the grocery shopping and you're doing it. We're cool.  Why should I sit up nights ruminating over your motivations?

Our actions are conditioned by lots of things, some of which we have some kind of half-assed acccess to, many of which are opaque to us and presumably many more of which are unkown to us and unsuspected by us.

If I should ask you why you did something, it is actually another question in disguise.  "What account do you offer as to why you did this?"   This in a sense which is very, very different from a request for a report of what actually motivated you, because I don't believe that you know why, in the first place.

If things are going along wonderfully but motivations are suspect, well you can focus on events or focus on largely inaccessible psychological states--or whatever motivations are. I don't even know what they are. 

But in a relationship, a close relationship, I have already ruled out concerns about ulterior motives. If those concerns arise then, well I am immediately not concerned about them, interestingly enough. Whatever particular situation happens to be giving rise to my doubts and suspicions about a person is very unimportant in comparison with the greater situation which finds me failing to trust.

I have enough on my plate managing the goings on in my own head. I think it is presumptuous, maybe rude, very toppy (as opposed to dominant) in any case, and mostly pointless to try to occupy someone else's. I'll bracket enough room to go in there for elective forays of psychological or enmotional sadism. That's just entertainment for me, though. I'll be fucked if I'll be chained to your  motivations as an ongoing relationship maintenance function.

If the behaviors and the vibe are right, who gives a shit? Direct your energy to something beautiful or something productive, or both, or just relax and go with it.

If either the behaviors or the vibe aren't where I want them, I get to work on the behaviors and the vibe.

If you're wondering about my motivations, or I'm wondering about yours--in any more than a trivial, passing way, then you and I don't belong so close together. That is to say that if I am with someone it is because I believe in that person in a deep way. Whatever her motivations may be, if they motivate behaviors I approve of then they are of no concern to me; I am content with them without knowing them, just as I am content with her blood chemistry without having hourly printout, presuming she's navigating the world and our relationship in a way that pleases me.

I demand a lot. For me to demand all that, and then besides go spelunking in her head and try to micromanage motivations, well in the first place that is way the fuck more maintenance than I want to do. I guess one of the things I expect of a partner is for her to manage her own motivations. If she isn't capable of doing that (with occasional help upon request, even) then she is way too much of a pain in the ass for me.







swtnsparkling -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 3:20:20 PM)

For myself- Doesn't Interfere in any way




Fawne -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 3:30:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: swtnsparkling

For myself- Doesn't Interfere in any way


Yeah.  me either. it is really simple.

So... it's all good :)




kyraofMists -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 3:39:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

For those of us "s" types, do you think that your masochism interferes your submissiveness? Do you worry that getting a masochistic fix will become your primary motivation for your submission?



No... and I would hate to think of the outcome if it did.  He is a hell of a lot more sadistic than I am a masochist.  I would certainly end up regretting that line of thought.  I shudder just to think of it.

Knight's kyra




julietsierra -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 4:10:37 PM)

lol...well, the day I was given a collar was the LAST time I played for over a year. And it was planned that way - little did I know at the time. It was not easy - oh no, not at all!!
But it was what it was and I'd told him I was here till he told me to go away. And well, he never told me to go away, so there I was - submitting to the man in charge of this relationship, not to the flogger he held.

So, no, I don't think my masochism gets in the way of my submission. That's what he was finding out in that year. And my submission doesn't influence my masochism. However, if I were to choose to withhold submission, it might just mess the whole thing up.

But I'm lucky, although many would think I'm not. In addition to the many things he is, he's also an emotional sadist...I get my masochism fulfilled in so many ways - and maoschism at the hands of an emotional sadist is particularly painful - and lasts MUCH longer than any bruise. However, what goes along with that emotional sadism/masochism is SO worth it, so it's never a bad thing.

juliet




catize -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 4:22:39 PM)

quote:

 For those of us "s" types, do you think that your masochism interferes your submissiveness? Do you worry that getting a masochistic fix will become your primary motivation for your submission?  


I've always made sure that the person I chose to submit to was a sadist.  I never ask for the pain; my submission includes the fact that he decides if and when it happens. 




MistressCamille -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 4:34:51 PM)

Most masochists I know aren't submissive at all.




onestandingstill -> RE: Does Masochism Interfere with Submissiveness? (1/22/2007 4:37:12 PM)




Not with the right Dom or Master.



quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

There was a question asked a while back that never got a proper answer from my perspective, and that is this:

For those of us "s" types, do you think that your masochism interferes your submissiveness? Do you worry that getting a masochistic fix will become your primary motivation for your submission?

For dominant types, have you noticed a difference between masochist submissives and non masochistic submissives when it comes to the motivations for their submissiveness, just in your experience of course.

I consider myself masochistic, I enjoy pain sometimes just for the sake of it. I used to worry that this would become my motivation for my submissiveness when I first began exploring this part of myself. I no longer worry about that for me personally, it is not my primary motivation, it does not interefere with my submissiveness whatsoever. I can see where it might begin to, if getting that "fix" became more important than doing what I was told, etc. I was wondering what other people's experiences in this regard are.





Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125