|
HatesParisHilton -> RE: Do agree or Disagree? (1/17/2007 5:34:48 PM)
|
the question can be answered in 2 ways: accepting gestalt of context ala "what they do" or not. If one accepts context is everything in theis medium of communication and "OP makes statement, we reply" and that in and of itself demands respect of context, especially when bearing in mind semiotics which are the skeleton and ligaments and tensons of all net/web communication on message boards and blogs, then the answer is "no" because in context what one person does requires no positive reaction from anyone else as long as they don;t fuck up and get sued or lose their job, merely mantain a basal level of competence (a Coucil Worker, for example). Whereas any journalist, writer, cosmetic surgeon, editor, Director of Photography, artist or artisan of any sort, is completely dependent upon the reaction of what they do as per the people tey do it for just to retain their livelihood and MAKE RENT. The context of what they get from the people they "do it for" and how much they won't get if they "fuck up" or perception of their skills/abilities/work ethics are (fairly or unfairly) subjec to the woeful tide of adverse or pejorative public opinion, which these days can swing on a dime thanks to viral advertizing among other things. If one wants to be a sheep in the herd and ignore context, then the answer is "they do it for themselves".
|
|
|
|