Kondolinni
Posts: 67
Joined: 4/2/2004 Status: offline
|
I was very happy to see the post here from julianaoceana. Opinions are wonderful things, but it is important that an agreed upon definition of a word or an idea be offerred before we begin a debate/dialogue on such a subject. I agree that the third definition in her post is the one that applies to human beings best. Integrity is the condition of being "complete", in whatever form that wholeness may take, according to the ideological needs/drives of an individual. Integrity, like many aspects of what we can call here "the human condition", is personally defined, and, on a more general level, applicable in the commonly accepted (albeit ill-defined) usage, only in a very specific sense to each situation as it unfolds. In the example offerred of the priest who shelters jews, I agree that his actions were morally and ethically proper. For him to act in such a manner when his own sefety was certainly also in joepardy further suggests he enjoys a high personal standard of integrity. Such acts of defiance in the face of peril are not within the abilities of those who are ruled by negative self-image issues. However, the actions of the preist remain subjective to the point of view of the observer. Would a Muslim priest sheltering Osama Bin Laden from a search conducted by U.S. Marines be any less the act of a man of deep integrity? Know, and remain true to your own standards, and you will have re-enforced your personal integrity. Act in discordance with your true nature, no matter the external conditions of the moment, and your personal integrity declines. Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, even Saddam Husein, at the beginnings of their careers, were men of tremendous personal integrity. They were also decidedly evil, by most standards. Integrity is not synonmous with ethics or morality, which are terms, incidentally, that also suffer ongoing redefinition according to the extent of circumstances of the human condition. It is, in my humble opinion, another example of western hubris that we believe unquestioningly in the accepted definition of moral or ethical behavior our history and literature teaches us to accept.
|