LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
Oh!.........the irony! Musicians are (blank), music is (blank). The sorts of sweeping generalisations a certain artist in this thread felt that I had made in relation to artists and art on another thread, and complained bitterly about it until it was pointed out to him that such was not the intention. I'd agree though - too much of today's "rock" is overproduced, overhyped commercial crap that lacks any of the spirit which defines rock. And lets not even talk about boy bands, girl bands and the masses of ill educated but PC literate dicks who can rhyme at a 3rd grade level in pre-school English; all of whom are promoted to death to youngsters who themselves lack any spirit of rebellion and gladly conform to the brain death such "music" requires. Such crap is not art. However, art as the expression of the human condition through song lives on in the background. Sooner or later, a new generation will come which will rebel against the marketing men - in fact it is happening now - just as punk came crashing into and wiped out the scandalous musical crimes of the 70s, and led us to twenty years of real music. Paradoxically perhaps, it is the technology which has made possible the crap of recent years, which is enabling this revolution; bands no longer need to conform to marketing formulae set out by executives - they go straight to the net and achieve success on their own merits. My advice; buy any youngster in your family an electric guitar, amp and distortion pedal this Christmas. This way, there will always be a supply of angry young rockers to supply real songs. And to impress the gals, of course LOL. And as for the visual arts. There will be no pics unless behaviour improves. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|