RE: Newbee Confusion (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

Morrigel -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 5:44:31 PM)

Exactly!

--M



Noah -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 5:48:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kyraofMists

And here I thought "beta" referred to who was second in command within a pack and not the submissive of the pack.  Or are we not discussing wolves here?  *eg*

Knight's kyra


Well you see, kyra, our new friend arrived here and discovered to his chagrin that the meanings of all of the terms we use are so well-established and agreed upon that he thought it would be useful to throw some new alpha-beticals into the soup.


I think there must be at least two different kinds of "fresh" points of view:


Child-like sense of wonder = good.

Adolescent-like sense of superior understanding based on two weekends of experience and watching videotaped* re-runs of a made-for-TV docu-drama on the subject = not actually so good.



*videotaped on beta, naturally.





Aine -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 6:45:05 PM)

Hows about this?

I'm a :

switch
babygirl
furry
bisexual


So yeah, babygirls CAN be Dominants.  IE: Switches lol



Shadowraven -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 7:10:00 PM)

Where to begin...
    I have only one or two posts on this site thus far, so I will try and be as respectful as possible considering my position as a newer member.

With the disclaimer noted I shall continue.

There are few things I find truly irritating; one of those is a person who covers atrocious grammar and unrefined writing skills with a flashy vocabulary. Any decent writer will take his audience into consideration when writing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but is it not the purpose of the written language to convey an idea or thought as simply and accurately as possible. The post, instead, managed to confuse almost every single reader... congratulations. Now with that said, I will not critique your post error-for-error.



LotusSong -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 7:38:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: adaddysgirl
i just wonder why he is so rigid with this thought?  [8|]
 
DG


And he is probably wondering how people can be so ambiguous.



sweetnurseBBW -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 7:40:55 PM)

Just look at his profile.  It answers alot.



MagiksSlave -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 8:00:40 PM)

Umm basicaly from my interpretation of what he has said is basically that he has a total double standerd that it is ok to be a pro Dom/me but not ok to be a pro sub.

Magik's outraged slave



sweetnurseBBW -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 8:07:14 PM)

I think he lives in his own little world where everyone fits into a category of some kind.



MagiksSlave -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 8:17:40 PM)

LOL let him stay there i dont want him in my world!!!!!!

Magik's slave



adaddysgirl -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 9:34:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

And he is probably wondering how people can be so ambiguous.


Lotus,
 
i can see people questioning what others do.  i do that myself....in trying to understand why others do what they do and/or how they have arrived at their conclusions.  But i question things like that.....i don't make statements of what someone should be like or not. 
 
The op is not wondering why/how lil girls can also be dominant.  He is basically saying that 'they should not be'.  There's a big difference between the two.   If he came on and said something like 'i talked with a lil girl who was also wanted to dominate and i do not understand that ambiguity'....he might have gotten a total different response here. 
 
In essence....i really do not think the op is questioning the ambiguity of a dominant lil girl.....i think he just finds it unacceptable....and i am just wondering why he finds it so. 
 
DG



Owned1 -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 10:14:30 PM)

I am rumaging around trying to find my decoder ring, but I think one of you already borrowed it........pleaseeeee return it I really wanna understand this thread.

Owned



juliaoceania -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 10:16:51 PM)

Seee Celeste's post (or bitatruble)



sweetnurseBBW -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 10:19:04 PM)

The decoder ring won't do you any good. I think it is some type of alien code.



LASub4Real -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 10:53:05 PM)

Excellent notion! Now pass the joint along now.



SlaveAkasha -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 11:10:07 PM)

Wow, Celeste.. I do understand it now.. I can't make sense of it, but I understand it.
 
Akasha



sweetnurseBBW -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 11:11:31 PM)

Has anyone noticed he looks like the unabomber? Just an observation.



BitaTruble -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 11:16:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SlaveAkasha

Wow, Celeste.. I do understand it now.. I can't make sense of it, but I understand it.
 
Akasha


It's all good, Akasha. Some people like wine and cheese, others like whine and thesaurus.

A rose by any other name... [8D]

Celeste



shadevarr -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/19/2006 11:45:26 PM)

Gods, that has to be one of the most convoluted statements I've read in a while. I do wonder how concepts like masichistic Doms and sadistic subbies fit in that black and white world. Oh, and my lil' girl is my slave and a Domme to everyone else. If they can take her, then I may give their ass a try. Just part of our dynamic.



amaidiamond -> RE: Newbee Confusion (10/23/2006 11:56:25 AM)

I'm not sure how I'd fit...being a bit of a blend, I'm submissive, masochistic, sexually sadistic on occasion with a switch side over females, also a non sexual babygirl... Hmmm....



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125