LadyHugs
Posts: 2299
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
Dear mistoferin, Ladies and Gentlemen; Each dominant is different. Their motives or 'intent' on putting male genitals into chastity devices, can vary from dominant to dominant. I find that it is difficult to have men remain in chastity. Most who do want a 'key holder' are into self denial, humiliation already and the dominant is just an enabler for the man who loves chastity devices. But, men's phallus is very pliable, to which it can fit or actually squirm right on out of most chastity devices if they really want to. The more modern chastity devices for men are a bit more difficult. In my own mind's eye, I prefer to have a man have the control over his sexual behavior and keep his peter in his pocket per se, until I want access to it. In my own mind's eye, I cannot trust a man servant/slave to keep his sex exclusively to me, then I don't want him. Those men who insist on chastity, in my own mind's eyes cannot be trusted; as they imply by the need for chastity; they cannot trust themselves--so, I shouldn't trust them either. I won't use one on my slaves. Those men who don't practice good cleaning of their genitals, are prone to issues. The band that goes into the buttocks crack does promote solid waste to linger under the band, of course that isn't fun to find or touch either. One reason why I carry some latex gloves for men who are in chastity. One cannot clean their poop chute well with a chastity device in the way. I just don't feel chastity devices sanitary. I see myself as an individual who doesn't need sex. I'm not interested in sex. I get more sexual giggles and grins out of service, such as getting my beverage, carrying my toy bags, being 'there' at my bidding and someone to be a wonderful companion, when I'm not torturing him out of his noodle. Respectfully submitted with a wee bit of wit, Lady Hugs
|