|
BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Come on ladies, get real.... (9/21/2006 11:03:25 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: guywithcutebutt Depending on the level of submission and expectations from some of these 'way out' posters, life can and does get in the way. How can one be self sufficient, while living in a cage or completely relinquishing control? It's simply not a practical arrangement in the 21st century. LOL, I don't know who you're talking about.... Never said I didn't want a thinking, self sufficient person who is submissive/slave to moi. Want to retain control, steer clear of me is all I'm sayin', LMAO. quote:
I myself do not seek a dominant woman for security or to 'take care of me'. I can take care of myself. I am also not seeking to be financially dominated. I enjoy submitting-- but I'm not keen on slavery. Does this mean I am any less capable of providing a level of happiness to a (genuine) woman who might enjoy my submission and her role as a dominant? Does this imply my understanding/desire of D's is any less authentic than anyone else here? I guess that would depend on the expectations and level of intent of the parties involved Nothing about what you said makes you less authentic. Nothing about what you said makes the domina for you less domme because we approach this differently. I responded because you said you wanted to clue us in (suggesting that those who do it differently are out of touch/unrealistic), and I wanted to clue you in to some differences; so that while my style isn't what works for you, it is no less authentic/reality based for me quote:
I am not seeking to be 'owned', branded, electrocuted, have my appendages mauled, or subject myself to any extreme physically abusive behavior just to find a dominant woman Is anyone offering to do these things to you? If they are, exercise your right to stay or walk away from what you feel crosses the line of sanity. quote:
I have my own thoughts, ideas, desires, and priorities-- it is hoped I can share these with a person who can recognize this, and also understands and nourishes my need to submit. Above all, I am not so 'hard up' that I would need to promise away my identity (nor my limits) to find a dominant woman (I prefer not to set myself up for failure). I suppose you could call me a 'masculine' sub You're suggesting that any man who submits to her expectations is hard up and not masculine? quote:
I believe it was Dale Carnegie who once wrote in "How to win Friends and Influence People" that 85% of all divorces are due to a lack of appreciation by one of the partners. The pendulum must swing both ways when it comes time, effort and appreciation That's kind of belaboring the obvious, dontcha think? I mean who among us walks away from someone who annoys us (or whom we no longer apreciate) to go find another exactly like him/her? Yes both people have to derive satisfaction in order to stay in a relationship. In order for me to remain in a relationship with a man, he cannot be so involved with everything else that I become the secondary thought in his day to day... I've never been too unreasonable to understand life interferes, but for me a man has some idea of how to treat his lady, even if he isn't submissive. In that I seek a gentleman who is submissive, I do demand some things of my man especially if he submits at my pleasure. M
|
|
|
|