Mavis
Posts: 828
Joined: 2/8/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy One thing I don't quite get is being married and having a "slave" who is married to someone else. I just don't see how a "slave" status is achievable here. I guess its a part time slave thing. I could never classify myself as a slave to my own Mistress because my first loyalties are to my wife --- so about the highest I can go on the meter is submisssive. Cloudboy, i understand where you're coming from, but i thought i would just pop in with.. i used to feel the same.. but when i got working with Master.. i saw the diffs and advantages, and now i am noting a lot of couples who have the Dom/sub dynamic at the house, and the external relationship is Master/slave. He has a wife/sub for 20 some years, and T/they haven't used the M/s dynamic because of her role as a parent and such, she needs the freedom to make independant choices and not have to worry over His overseeing or directing. Since her love relationship needs and sexual needs are met there, she needs the right to negotiate for her pleasure and do all the give and take needed to run a successful home. i need those same rights with my spouse, so i am sub to Hubby, not slave. Master has clear lines of authority that have been hashed out between Him and myself, ANd betwen Hubby and Him. Once those lines are demarcated, i need no right to negotiate within that framework. (as always, slave votes with her feet if needed) Having areas the Master is not in control of isn't that unusual, in the case of a single parent w/ unmentionables, a Master often has a hands-off stance in that one area of slaves life. Master having "Masters rights" rather than Domly rights over me allows Him the freedom to manage His time and resources without having to answer to me for His choices. It's clear i come after His sub and family, my role is distinctly different, and i can "keep my eyes on my own paper" as He puts it. (the above is O/our choice to use the terms sub to mean "with negotiating rights" and slave to mean "negotiated once, then set." i understand, and so should readers, that this is not the only way sub and slave are defined)
|