darkinshadows
Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004 From: UK Status: offline
|
julia - quote:
I guess I am doing something atrocious, because I was raised that marriage comes with certain expectations, such as the wedding vows entail. I am old fashioned, true, and my exhubby didn't live up to his end, true... I guess this is an atrocity on my part to believe that marriage comes with certain expectations.. old fashioned that I am. Yes I used the word atrocious... because to me it is. It is my truth - to me. If that offends you that I am being honest, not my responsibility. The atrocity is not that marriage comes with certain expectations - its that only marriage comes with expectation and that is what concerned me about your statement. 'In sickness and in health' isnt just a marriage vow - it is an ethic, and whether I was married or not to a man who was my dominant - that is an integral part of my submission. Being married doesnt make it more important nor is it more of an expectation because one is married. Its all part of an intense, loving and fulilling relationship. quote:
To me a marriage is more than a piece of paper, your interpretation differs, as do others, that is cool with me. Marriage is a religious commitment. It is a spiritual commitment. It is a personal one. Its a legal one. Take all four if you want... take just a couple ... or just choose one... even choose your own. Marriage is more than a piece of paper... yet a piece of paper does not a marriage make. quote:
A collar is a deep abiding commitment in my eyes, but it is not necessarily the same commitment as marriage to me, others will differ. A collar is whatever one wants it to be. Yet it does not a submissive make. quote:
I have stated that I would not leave a commitment due to illness, others will differ Of course. But that happens in a marriage, or not. Being married doesnt leave you with the expectation of commiting to stay for some people. quote:
I do not know what your point is other than you do not agree with my views, which is cool with me, I do not expect you to. I dont agree, correct. But that doesnt make you wrong - just means we dont agree. I prefere to communicate with someone and offer another side - even if we dont agree and if I believe you are intelligent enough to hold a discussion I will attempt to hold it. Erin (and I know she will not mind me mentioning her in this) is a classic example of someone I agree to disagree with, yet she and I will talk over and over on a thread and we love each other for it. People dont have to respond, and often they don't. Thats your choice. However, some people will disagree with you, julia - you posted an OP and further postings, expect all different types of responses. The 'whole point' is that I dont agree that a marriage is some unique entity that comes with expectations. You begin a relationship, a deep, commited one... that has the same expectations. To love each other deeply, to admire each other... to live together happily until you die. To look after each other, through the bad and the good. That isnt just something unique to a marriage. Thats the expectations of any long term commited and serious, stable relationship - BDSM, 'vanilla', gay, poly, pansexual - the whole kitandkaboodle. Your statement was - quote:
Personally I would want the marriage contract along with the collar to protect each other in the future if it were that commited of a relationship. Not everyone can do this because they are poly for example... Apart from maybe legal duties, which can be sorted out with any good lawer, insurences etc anyway... why would a marriage protect you any more than not having one? If you have to get married to feel protected, then all I am suggesting is that you ask yourself why you don't already feel protected within the relationship. Because being married doesnt protect you any more - not in the modern world - especially from people leaving you because you may fall sick. Peace and Rapture.
_____________________________
.dark. ...i surrender to gravity and the unknown... |