quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

That has been repeatedly debunked, by senior intel officials with names.

White House had access to intelligence assessments such as the Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) that Congress never was able to review, and the administration failed to provide lawmakers with certain dissenting views within the intelligence community. The administration also received information directly from two alternative intelligence sources that were doubted by the Intelligence Community at the time and have since been discredited: The Office of Special Plans and Iraqi National Congress. Even among the intelligence that Congress did ultimately receive, most lawmakers did not see a full assessment of the Iraqi threat prior to the delivery of the National Intelligence Estimate.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Your articles says nothing of the sort.

Tin foil people said the US knew of the attacks and helped in their execution.

What Bob Graham is saying is that Saudi government officials, charities, and individuals, both in the US and abroad helped 9/11.

One is not at all like the other.

BUT 911 was a monumental crime.

By definition 'helped' in the commission of a crime IS a 'conspiracy'.

So we need an strong reasoned explanation from you respecting my above point and why I should consider your opinion over that of a former intelligence operator who worked for the NSA.

In addition the massive negligence and outright fraud surrounding the investigation and material evidence is overwhelming, but that aside, how did you conclude its all nice perfectly innocent?

It appears it does say precisely what it claims!

Reread my previous response. Listen to Senator Graham yourself. In no case does he say members of the US government colluded in the attack.

quote:

CBS reports, Graham and his Joint Inquiry co-chair in the House, former Representative Porter Goss (R-FL) — who went on to be director of the CIA — say the 28 pages were excised from their report by the Bush Administration in the interest of national security. Graham wouldn’t discuss the classified contents, but says the 28 pages outline a network of people he believes supported hijackers in the U.S. He tells Steve Kroft he believes the hijackers were “substantially” supported by Saudi Arabia. Asked if the support was from government, rich people or charities, the former senator replies, “all of the above.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire
i have watched a few, just never an inconvenient truth.

How about NIST, that is the National Institue of Standards and Technology who instead of loudly trumpting here is what we found and this is what you engineers cant do because its dangerous instead and contrary to the reasons of their existence in the first place they classified the failure mechanisms of a building that no longer exists because it would JEOPARDIZE PUBLIC SAFETY!

NIST exists for the sole purpose of testing and informing the engineering communities of the Do's and Don'ts in building design and construction (and other areas) to insure failures cannot occur, however in the case of 911 they hide the causes because if engineers know how a building failed that would JEOPARDIZE PUBLIC SAFETY!

So you can poke fun of conspiracies, which is a CIA created disinformation tactic used to get people to emotionally dismiss sensitive issues that have gubblemint involvement and look the other way before reading all the facts because the last thing they would want to be is a demonized conspiracy theorist after all.

Got any good jingoistic euphemisms or non-conspiracy 'theories' for that one?

Is that inconvenient enough?

Long story short the bulk of the NIST evaluation of the 911 event is rooted entirely in fraud.

I too remain open minded