RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban

RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thompsonx -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/17/2016 6:49:56 PM)
ORIGINAL: ifmaz ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: ifmaz ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Duh, that is one of the basic first things they drill into your head in basic training, Usually the first thing they try to teach you is which one is your left foot. The next thing is which is your right foot.[8\|] Which one of those are you trained to shoot at? ;) The miiltary takes a dim view of that sort of behaviour. they usually charge the miscreant with destruction of government property. Had you ever been in the military you would have known that What was your MOS? 0311

bounty44 -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 10:17:18 AM)
quote: What was your MOS? 0311 quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s, Roflmfao http://www.collarchat.com/m_4875342/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#

Lucylastic -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 10:44:15 AM)
What are you trying to say!

stef -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 10:55:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic What are you trying to say! I don't think he knows.

ifmaz -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 12:15:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: What was your MOS? 0311 quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s, Roflmfao http://www.collarchat.com/m_4875342/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm# This may have been thompsonx incorrectly assuming the "I was a NAVY SEAL" statement originated from Phydeaux and not the linked article.

bounty44 -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 4:28:12 PM)
it is primarily his inequitable position that he should be taken seriously saying he was a marine rifleman while not giving others the same or similar consideration.

thompsonx -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 5:27:47 PM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD No it means that people are starting to see through the Democratic lies about guns that look like assault rifles. I am pretty sure brady was raguns mouthpiece and a republicrat.

thompsonx -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 5:33:43 PM)
This may have been thompsonx incorrectly assuming the "I was a NAVY SEAL" statement originated from Phydeaux and not the linked article. Did you see any quote marks on the dawg's statement?

thompsonx -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 5:39:58 PM)
ORIGINAL: bounty44 it is primarily his inequitable position that he should be taken seriously saying he was a marine rifleman while not giving others the same or similar consideration. Comrade pogue, if that duce gear is a little too heavy for you just chuck it, you won't ever need it.[8\|]

ifmaz -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 5:46:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx This may have been thompsonx incorrectly assuming the "I was a NAVY SEAL" statement originated from Phydeaux and not the linked article. Did you see any quote marks on the dawg's statement? I read the linked article and noted Phydeaux, like you and others, did not use the quote "tag".

thompsonx -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/18/2016 5:54:57 PM)
ORIGINAL: ifmaz ORIGINAL: thompsonx This may have been thompsonx incorrectly assuming the "I was a NAVY SEAL" statement originated from Phydeaux and not the linked article. Did you see any quote marks on the dawg's statement? I read the linked article and noted Phydeaux, like you and others, did not use the quote "tag". Really?

BamaD -> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban (1/19/2016 6:37:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Sieg Heil. Nobody is banning guns. See, for example H R 4269. The fact that it failed does not mean they don't want to ban. And don't say they aren't banning all guns so it doesn't count. When they list the firearms people can still own, they are in effect saying see how nice we are, we are letting you keep some fireams, for now.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.015625