RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Real0ne -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/1/2015 11:00:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

If he was a rich white guy, odds are, that we would not be having this conversation.

Well, if he was a sweet little old black lady we probably wouldn't either.

K.





then he'd be found dead in a jail cell instead.




Marini -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/1/2015 11:02:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

If he was a rich white guy, odds are, that we would not be having this conversation.

Well, if he was a sweet little old black lady we probably wouldn't either.

K.





then he'd be found dead in a jail cell instead.


You are on fire tonight.
Sandra was not old though.




Kirata -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/1/2015 11:39:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

If he was a rich white guy, odds are, that we would not be having this conversation.

Well, if he was a sweet little old black lady we probably wouldn't either.

then he'd be found dead in a jail cell instead.

Here's a case worthy of your talents. Offender blocking roadway, no identification, refuses to follow lawful orders.

[image]http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03387/animals-owl_3387381k.jpg[/image]

K.




Real0ne -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/2/2015 12:40:36 AM)

too late.....

he got whats comin to him! huah! [8D]


[image]https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4135/4780496349_e3d1c64de8_n.jpg[/image]




Kirata -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/2/2015 12:45:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

too late.....

he got whats comin to him! huah! [8D]

[image]https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4135/4780496349_e3d1c64de8_n.jpg[/image]

Obviously because he wasn't white.

K.




MercTech -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/2/2015 8:05:56 AM)

After looking at the video three times I have a feeling I can see what the defense will say.

Traffic stop
Driver acting very suspicious ad indications of being under the influence.
When ordered to exit the vehicle the driver starts the car to flee the scene.
Officer draws pistol and attempts to restrain the driver.
Pistol discharges when the driver rushes off with the officer's arm in the window trying to stop the driver from fleeing.

Another death from stupidity is more like it.




Lucylastic -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/2/2015 8:29:48 AM)

I saw the cop attempt to open the door, , the car started and moved slowly, the gun appears and wham, he gets knocked over by the now dead guys foot goin down on the accelerator.
but shrugs, I havent watched it frame by frame.




BamaD -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/2/2015 2:47:19 PM)

FR

Yet another cop was murdered in Memphis last night during a traffic stop.
To echo questions asked by leftists earlier, does a man deserve to die for asking for a drivers license?
This is a can happen anytime a cop stops someone, particularly when the driver seems to have been drinking, is hostile, and lies to him.




Real0ne -> RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted (8/3/2015 9:40:57 AM)

In these conversations there is a fundamental problem. The 900 pound gorilla.

Its like most of these matters a 'trap' and most people are none the wiser as they walk right in.

What they have done is to place the constitutional 'right to free travel', (which is purely private) [..and by the locomotion of the times] under the same umbrella as regulated 'commercial driving', [the conversion from private no touch zone to commercial regulated zone severely reduces peoples rights]. Hence when you are stopped and they talk with you they label everything as driver, driving etc which if you do not protest their label [forced to be belligerent/uncooperative] on the spot, it constitutes a legal contract being made on the spot with your tacit acceptance of the officers definition/charges which the court will then accept. Why wouldnt the court accept it? After all the traveler has accepted the re-characterization. They have gotten so bold they have even included travel in their statutes as something they are authorized to infringe upon. Its all about revenue. Common people who do not use the highway as a place of business were never expected to get licensed, any more than the ownership of arms. It does not matter how little it infringes it is a no go zone. Non-traffic laws believe it or not completely take care of all traffic matters. All that the state needed to do was to make their rules of the road pamplet, case would be decided in common law tribunals under law and equity. But nope, like everything else they are mafia minded and create a thriving business for themselves at the end of a barrel of a gun. dubose comes to mind. That is why I post the eddie craig, x deputy sheriff where even he gets beat to shit by these road nazis despite his extremely professional conduct when confronted by the road nazis.

Its their job to trap you, and they do it in the language they use. If you use the language that is correct for your situation they merely ignore it and move forward under their terms regardless. This is why eddie teaches how to reverse the situation and set them up for a suit, in federal court, precisely what they are doing to you to insure their ill-gotten revenue stream.

The whole key is that driving is fully regulated commercial activity and traveling is private in the no touch zone. The courts have illegitimately and continue to illegitimately commingle the commercial privilege with the private right to obtain regulatory jurisdiction in the no touch zones to destroy private rights and put everyone under the same umbrella. [Commercial and regulated]

Nothing will change until people wise up and grasp the distinctions. As irony would have it, the russian constitution makes these distinctions between man and beast perfectly clear. Now thats irony imo! [8D]





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
1.513672E-02