RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal - 3/2/2015 10:44:25 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

Could be right who knows. Hence the wording in my post. If the Administration isn't involved in corercing the insurance companies as a cost savings all well and good. If the Administration should have caught this before, not so good. If the insurance coluded to keep insurance claims down, not good. If they hid that information from the Administration in some manner not good. Lots of different options. Not sure yet which one fits. If, as I suspect, Congress gets into the act, they will look toward the Administration for the answers - hence probable scandal - because they will yell coverup.

Insurance companies have been fucking people out of money forever. You seriously think that this administration (inside, outside, above, below, to the side) TOLD them to do that?

Its....probable.
apparently.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Gauge)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal - 3/2/2015 2:08:43 PM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

With funding running out, I do believe it is possible that someone came along and said something to the affect that we should try to hold claims down and it was taken to far by an underling. I have seen it happen before in government.

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal - 3/2/2015 2:12:39 PM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
With funding running out, I do believe it is possible that someone came along and said something to the affect that we should try to hold claims down and it was taken to far by an underling. I have seen it happen before in government.

That could be correct, and might even be probable, if, and only if, government gave a rat's ass about how much was being spent. It's $23B in the hole. What's another couple billion? Chump change for the Federal Government. That's only, what, 0.6% of the budget? That's like one hammer and one toilet seat. A mere pittance.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to KenDckey)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal - 3/2/2015 4:54:23 PM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/senators-fema-has-questions-to-answer-on-superstorm-sandy-claims/

Yup Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of NY is the one who wants the investigation in the Administration failure to act it appears.

I support this investigation. Hope it is fruitful.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal - 3/2/2015 5:24:24 PM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/senators-fema-has-questions-to-answer-on-superstorm-sandy-claims/
Yup Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of NY is the one who wants the investigation in the Administration failure to act it appears.
I support this investigation. Hope it is fruitful.

Actions by FEMA, aren't necessarily tied to the Administration in DC, though. That's the tough thing. Also, there is little to no incentive for the Administration to not send as much aid as humanly possible to those people.

The insurance companies are alleged to have doctored engineering reports (from the articles presented, it sure looks like they're guilty of that). FEMA, for whatever reason, didn't investigate, as it should have. Why? Was Obama behind it? Again, what motive would there have been?

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to KenDckey)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: FEMA The next probable Administration Scandal - 3/2/2015 6:19:13 PM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

It always appears that Obama's hands are clean. As to motive I have no clue. From what it appears to me is that the Administration is out of control, at least somewhat. Otherwise there wouldn't be so many scandals, lies, and misrepresentations. My opinion.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 26