Yachtie
Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JeffBC Quick... let's try to guess what sort of spin the WALL STREET journal might put on things. But hey, if you don't want to think about that you might just ponder all the obvious spin in the article itself. Do I think scientists are incorruptible? No, I do not. Is that article even remotely credible? No, it is not. So what is it that makes the article not credible? Is it that the WSJ is reporting on the spin already spun? At a closed-door meeting in Stockholm this week, each paragraph of a document written by scientists is being projected onto large screens. Delegations from scores of nations participate in the editing: Words will be substituted, emphasis will be added, entire sentences may well be inserted or deleted. After four days of haggling, the media will be summoned by the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to a news conference on Friday where the final version of the document—known as the "Summary for Policymakers"—will be released along with a solemn announcement that "science" has spoken. The article is definitely a hit piece. But a hit on whom or what? It's not a hit piece on science itself. That's not where the finger points.
_____________________________
“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC “Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell
|