Driver1961
Posts: 459
Joined: 9/8/2005 Status: offline
|
He dips His lid, Nice answers Caretaker, L/Alb, and CrouchingTigress to my subspace questions.. I agree with all your comments. Is it a higher level of BDSM, is it relevant to classify it as such? To CrouchingTigress, and others, I never said Spacing is a higher level of BDSM- I simply posed the question. My reasoning is similar to L/a's. I am aware that some percieve it as the pinnacle of BDSM. I* prefer to consider it as an exquisite element of BDSM that no-one has personally related any similar experience to me, hence part of my questioning. (see Kundalini in say Wikipedia) My first sub was very susceptible to it, I could touch her forehead, pinch her back, or even unconsiously intonate, and initiate mild to deep spacing. All without the expectation of/or use of pain. This reaction from my first sub was, like others since, simply a causitive result of our percieved connection or their perceived connection to me in D/s. CrouchTigress defines 'profound' and it is personally subjective just as the majority of comments on all the board are! We all like to 'label' or 'classify' but it can actually stop deeper understanding of others, eg yesterday's Is my sub gay? http://www.collarchat.com/m_451442/tm.htm or even some of the answers on this thread (see my first post here-post 15) Yes Caretaker, I do agree that Spacing is certainly not soley connected to pain, and yes in my experience there is mental (dare I say intellectual?) stimulation prior to the release of the natural opiate. Even a masochist who spaces purely on the pain without 'knowing' the Dom is still being mentally stimulated in the lead up to play and play warm up. This masochist would be thinking, utilising higher cognitive abilities. Higher level cognitive abilities are in my opinion simply the 'engine' or 'drive' behind Intellect. (No doubt some confirmation of this view could be found with the various Cognitive theorists- eg Pavlov.) Are simpler words the only difference in C/Tigresses and according to Websters intellect is: The ability to learn and reason; the capacity for knowledge and understanding. The ability to think abstractly or profoundly So what is my point? Simply I believe the Original Poster Oepedis was correct in his wordingquote:
I was inspired by a recent conversation to pose this question: What do you think are the intellectual aspects most appealing in bdsm? So many possible answers. Some of mine would include: The clarity of each participant's desires promotes excellent communication and intimacy. A more intimate union, whether sexual or not, allows freer expression and uninhibited imagination. Clarity of purpose, intimate communication and the free expression of an uninhibited imagination lead to excellence in other areas. So, I suppose my premise is good bdsm interaction leads to a higher plane. What's your own premise? So let's move on with our varied perceptions or cognitive thoughts (like the last thetammyjoe post) of our responses to Oepedis's thread! Hooray I finally was able to 'box' a quote! I have extended my cyber intellect! Warm regards to all from Driver1961. Wildchild's much loved Sir Smuggy.
< Message edited by Driver1961 -- 6/29/2006 5:25:00 PM >
_____________________________
Dance as though nobody is watching!
|