defiantbadgirl
Posts: 2988
Joined: 11/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri This is where you are wrong. This wasn't about affordable care. It isn't actually making care affordable. It is shifting the cost of care onto those who make more money. The actual cost of the care provided isn't going to go down, that is, get more affordable overall. It's simply cost shifting. And, it's really about shifting the cost of insurance, not the cost of care. I meant it would reduce the cost of care to people with low incomes, but you are right in what you say. The beauty of single-payer health care is the ability to control the cost of the health care and drugs (compare the cost of an expensive drug in the US to the cost of the same drug in Canada). The American government is controlled by corporations. Members of congress vote the way they are told to vote by the special interests that finance their campaigns. That's why single-payer, which would've had the ability to control costs, wouldn't pass even with a Democrat controlled Congress. As long as the United States is run by the corporations for the corporations, controlling the actual cost of care like other countries with single-payer systems do will be extremely difficult, if not impossible.
_____________________________
Only in the United States is the health of the people secondary to making money. If this is what "capitalism" is about, I'll take socialism any day of the week. Collared by MartinSpankalot May 13 2008
|