gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!??

gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Owner59 -> gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/15/2013 9:43:51 PM)
Jack asses times 37....

SadistDave -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/16/2013 8:32:38 PM)
Although it would be much easier for the House to simply refuse to fund it, if it takes another 37 attempts, or 137 attempts to repeal that piece of shit law then they need to keep trying until it's repealed. -SD

Owner59 -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/16/2013 8:56:15 PM)
Yeah.....keeping poor folks from dying......how shitty.... Thanks for pointing out awesome republicans are......

subrob1967 -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/16/2013 8:56:26 PM)
FR Why the hell isn't anyone blaming the Senate and Harry Reid for ignoring the will of the people, and forcing the House to spend money on this legislation 37 times? The Republicans in the house are doing their job, why isn't the Senate?

Owner59 -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/16/2013 9:04:07 PM)
Great sarcasm....well done.

Owner59 -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/16/2013 9:09:24 PM)
CBO: Repealing Obama healthcare law will increase budget deficit "Congressional budget analysts said Wednesday that repealing ObamaCare would increase the deficit by scrapping the law's taxes, fees and spending cuts. The notice from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) came ahead of Thursday's House vote on full repeal of the Affordable Care Act. The CBO refused to provide a new cost estimate for repeal, saying there is too little time before the vote. But Director Doug Elmendorf pointed to an estimate from July 2012 that abolishing healthcare reform would raise the deficit by $109 billion over 10 years. "Although [we] have not updated that estimate to reflect the most recent baseline projections, we anticipate a similar result were we to do so," Elmendorf wrote in a letter to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/healthcare/299895-cbo-obamacare-repeal-will-increase-the-deficit#ixzz2TWHTAOs2 Follow us: @thehill on Twitter \| TheHill on Facebook"

RottenJohnny -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/16/2013 11:41:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 CBO: Repealing Obama healthcare law will increase budget deficit "Congressional budget analysts said Wednesday that repealing ObamaCare would increase the deficit by scrapping the law's taxes, fees and spending cuts. The notice from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) came ahead of Thursday's House vote on full repeal of the Affordable Care Act. The CBO refused to provide a new cost estimate for repeal, saying there is too little time before the vote. But Director Doug Elmendorf pointed to an estimate from July 2012 that abolishing healthcare reform would raise the deficit by $109 billion over 10 years. So the ACA isn't about healthcare afterall. It's about covering the defecit. The Dems better be careful if they start blowing this horn too loudly.

DomKen -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 2:51:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 CBO: Repealing Obama healthcare law will increase budget deficit "Congressional budget analysts said Wednesday that repealing ObamaCare would increase the deficit by scrapping the law's taxes, fees and spending cuts. The notice from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) came ahead of Thursday's House vote on full repeal of the Affordable Care Act. The CBO refused to provide a new cost estimate for repeal, saying there is too little time before the vote. But Director Doug Elmendorf pointed to an estimate from July 2012 that abolishing healthcare reform would raise the deficit by $109 billion over 10 years. So the ACA isn't about healthcare afterall. It's about covering the defecit. The Dems better be careful if they start blowing this horn too loudly. It was always about reducing the amount the government spends on health care while also expanding who is covered by some form of insurances as wellas better regulating private insurers.

subsissy4bbc -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 7:02:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Yeah.....keeping poor folks from dying......how shitty.... Thanks for pointing out awesome republicans are...... Why is that the government's problem? If I choose not to get an education so I can get a job with insurance or purchase insurance by myself, that is my decision. People to not take personal responsibility for their lives any more. It's always someone else's fault or problem. If there was actual competition in healthcare, it would be more affordable just like car insurance. Tort reform would also help. And when have you ever seen poor people just dying in the streets? There has always been a safety net, this is just about money and controlling more of our lives. Also if it was just about helping the people, things should have been put in place much faster. Just think of all the poor people dying right now.

Owner59 -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 7:09:13 AM)
No one is forcing you to work or to use Obamacare...... And the government doesn`t control healthcare....the healthcare industry does that. The ACA helps pay the bills.

DaddySatyr -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 7:20:53 AM)
Ever since the anti-Christ (Hillary Rotten Clinton) tried to float her shitty version of healthcare reform 20 years ago I have been saying that the easiest fix to healthcare issues in this country is to remove the words "over 65" from Medicare. Essentially, as far as how it works (not the coverage levels), it's the same plan that covers congress. Job done. Peace and comfort, Michael

Owner59 -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 7:34:46 AM)
If the best your party has to offer is mitt,rand and newt......say hello to President Hillary in 2016......[:D]

SadistDave -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 8:27:10 AM)
Run Hillary. Get used to her being grilled at every debate on her negligence concerning Bengazi for the next 4 years. She will repeatedly be scrutinized for her apathy for the 4 people died because she did not give them adequate security in a know hostile region. Get used to watching her screech "What difference does it make? over and over on your television now. No doubt it will become a favorite GOP attack ad, unless she does something even more reprehensible between now and then. I know I'm looking forward to it. I'm just wondering how long she lasts before she loses her cool like she did at the Congressional hearing. I have to admit, I'm also going to enjoy chuckling over the predictable wailing and gnashing of teeth from the libs when it happens. But even if she manages the win, we get at least 4 more years of Bill, and that will at least be entertaining. Bill Clinton in the White House is always interesting. Hillary was really not even an interesting First Lady. So, we all know that Hillary will always be accused of doing whatever Bill tells her whether it's true or not. Love him or hate him, Bill Clinton has a reputation and a personality that will always make Hillary seem like a sad and unimpressive substitute. No matter what she does, she will stand in his shadow until her dying day. As a President, she will always be standing in his shadow at home and abroad. President Hillary won't have any real political clout of her own, and won't be able to push the lefts agendas as effectively as anyone else that might win the DNC nomination. A Hillary Clinton Presidency is almost a win for the GOP. -SD-

mnottertail -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 8:29:09 AM)
She wont get grilled at the debates over nothing. No more than Obama was grilled at the debates over his birth certificate, there arent that many imbeciles that would pass the security checkpoint on personal grooming, alone.

SadistDave -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 8:41:20 AM)
We'll just have to see. I suspect you are going to be very unpleasantly surprised on this point, and no doubt will lead the charge of whining lefties on the forums here. This is considerably more real than the birther nonsense. People died as a direct result of Hillary's leadership and policies and she doesn't think it matters. That's a political gift that will keep on giving, and giving, and giving. -SD-

mnottertail -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 8:47:24 AM)
Oh, my dying ass, people died as a result of Ws leadership, of Georges leadership, of St. Wrinklemeats leadership. People die. And you can jack off about it all day, but cannot prove that to be the case, nor can you even plausibly create a scenario that it is the case.

Hillwilliam -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 8:57:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave Although it would be much easier for the House to simply refuse to fund it, if it takes another 37 attempts, or 137 attempts to repeal that piece of shit law then they need to keep trying until it's repealed. -SD Repeating the same action over and over with the expectation of a different outcome is the definition of insanity. ---Albert Einstein

Hillwilliam -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 9:00:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave Run Hillary. Get used to her being grilled at every debate on her negligence concerning Bengazi for the next 4 years. She will repeatedly be scrutinized for her apathy for the 4 people died because she did not give them adequate security in a know hostile region. Get used to watching her screech "What difference does it make? over and over on your television now. No doubt it will become a favorite GOP attack ad, unless she does something even more reprehensible between now and then. I know I'm looking forward to it. I'm just wondering how long she lasts before she loses her cool like she did at the Congressional hearing. I have to admit, I'm also going to enjoy chuckling over the predictable wailing and gnashing of teeth from the libs when it happens. But even if she manages the win, we get at least 4 more years of Bill, and that will at least be entertaining. Bill Clinton in the White House is always interesting. Hillary was really not even an interesting First Lady. So, we all know that Hillary will always be accused of doing whatever Bill tells her whether it's true or not. Love him or hate him, Bill Clinton has a reputation and a personality that will always make Hillary seem like a sad and unimpressive substitute. No matter what she does, she will stand in his shadow until her dying day. As a President, she will always be standing in his shadow at home and abroad. President Hillary won't have any real political clout of her own, and won't be able to push the lefts agendas as effectively as anyone else that might win the DNC nomination. A Hillary Clinton Presidency is almost a win for the GOP. -SD- Are you complaining about Clinton's presidency? This country had prosperity not seen before or since during his presidency. Morally, he was a fuckhead but he got shit done for the country.

SadistDave -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 9:10:08 AM)
She was in charge and repeatedly denied extra security when it was requested. Then she lost her cool when she was grilled on her attempts to cover up the terrorist attack in a Congressional hearing and asked "What difference at this point does it make?" Really... it's like a Christmas present to the GOP to have her run! -SD-

DomKen -> RE: gop trying to repeal ACA for 37th time?!?? (5/17/2013 9:19:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr Ever since the anti-Christ (Hillary Rotten Clinton) tried to float her shitty version of healthcare reform 20 years ago I have been saying that the easiest fix to healthcare issues in this country is to remove the words "over 65" from Medicare. Essentially, as far as how it works (not the coverage levels), it's the same plan that covers congress. Job done. As someone on Medicare I can assure you it is not the same as what Congress gets. Medicare charges a 20% copay on all out patient procedures and doctor's visits. It also has next to no vision or dental coverage.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875