crazyml- I think it is much more childish to try and use my profile as an attack. It is also a serious oversight on your part. Next time try to find something that stings dcnovice- that is a very good point, and I didn't really think of it that way, at all. athenasurrenders- no. It was absolutely not directed at your comment- I was irritated that some one told me to go back and read a comment that was posted only moments before. Quoting is, as you mentioned, standard.
DesFIP -> RE: Old threads (2/16/2013 6:43:01 PM)
quote:
ORIGINAL: myotherself
...and then hopefully the new person realizes they've made a minor faux pas, says 'oops, sorry!' and continues on to be a valuable member of the message boards. [:)]
Feeling wildly optimistic today, I see.
However, for anyone needing comic relief, I recommend reading the op's profile.
HarryVanWinkle -> RE: Old threads (2/16/2013 7:03:02 PM)
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Do you talk to somebody years after they've left the room?
<<< Talks to Elvis
ResidentSadist -> RE: Old threads (2/16/2013 8:05:07 PM)
Imagine that all the noobs searching wild and random things, nercoed thousands of dead threads each week. That would kill the forum because no active threads could remain at the top of the stack. Interaction would die off, as would the forum.
Level -> RE: Old threads (2/16/2013 8:25:27 PM)
quote:
ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Do you talk to somebody years after they've left the room?
<<< Talks to Elvis
LOL [:D]
crazyml -> RE: Old threads (2/16/2013 11:34:09 PM)
Oh bless you! I was trying to help you. You see once the edit period is over your posts stay here forever.
Did you try doing the little exercise?
Can you see how someone might conclude that you're a bit, well "stupid" ?