RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 7:25:09 AM)

What are the stock phrases of the lunatic right?




Lucylastic -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 7:30:22 AM)

maybe he got it from this "left wing" site, LMFAO
FAIL
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/14/Obama-impeachment




subrob1967 -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 7:55:51 AM)

There's no way we can impeach our brilliant President, or Vice President... Even if they act above the law.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 12:18:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967
There's no way we can impeach our brilliant President, or Vice President... Even if they act above the law.


Care to explain, Rob? Are you saying it can't happen because it'll never through the Democrat-led Senate, or that there isn't any way they can be impeached, regardless of what the Constitution states? I wholeheartedly agree with the former, but not the latter. And, in this case, I don't see it warranting impeachment. I reserve the right to call for impeachment of Obama and/or Biden if they *do* violate their oaths of office.




Moonhead -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 12:22:32 PM)

I think that was just part of the 'say nice things about the Kenyan" bet he had with Lucy...




Lucylastic -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 12:27:37 PM)

It was Tazzy and sarcasm isnt part of saying something nice... which he welched on weeks ago, soooooooo.. he has a fail on both aspects really:)




tazzygirl -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 12:28:21 PM)

He had with me... that he reneged upon a while back.




searching4mysir -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 12:29:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Surely with everything in gridlock and a country divided down the middle, there has to be a mechanism for an elected leader to legislate.

Why weren't people complaining when Bush started an illegal war?



Nope, because the President is part of the Executive branch of the government and not the Legislative branch. It isn't his JOB to legislate anything.




Ronnie1986 -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 12:38:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fightdirecto

quote:

Responding to reports that President Obama is considering signing as many as nineteen executive orders on gun control, Republicans in Congress unleashed a blistering attack on him today, accusing Mr. Obama of “cynically and systematically using his position as President to lead the country.”

Spearheading the offensive was Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas), who charged the President with the “wanton exploitation of powers that are legally granted to him under the U.S. Constitution.”

Calling him the “Law Professor-in-Chief,” Rep. Stockman accused Mr. Obama of “manipulating a little-known section of the Constitution,” Article II, which outlines the power of the President.

“President Obama looks down the list of all of the powers that are legally his and he’s like a kid in a candy store,” Rep. Stockman said. “It’s nauseating.”

The Texas congressman said that if Mr. Obama persists in executing the office of the Presidency as defined by the Constitution, he could face “impeachment and/or deportation.”

Noting that the President has not yet signed the executive orders on gun control, Rep. Stockman said that he hoped his stern words would serve as a wake-up call to Mr. Obama: “Mr. President, there’s still time for you to get in line. But if you continue to fulfill the duties of President of the United States that are expressly permitted in the Constitution, you are playing with fire.”


Republicans Accuse Obama of Using Position as President to Lead Country

Political satire from Andy Borowitz



what else would you call it? he is acting as a dictator.. in ndaa he made sure the military could take civilians into custody and hold without trial or even execute for whatever reason the gov feels.. he is trying to take away the second amendment which is there to protect us against tyranny.. the second amendment allows us to have firearms as capable as those used by the military in the event we ever have to rise against the government because it will be the military we will be facing off against to end tyranny.. by banning the "military looking guns" which is a joke because you can make any gun look military and with the stupid assault rifle definition that the government is using any gun could be an assault rifle.. he is opening the door to many more things.. first he bans rifles then it will be pistols and shotguns then once we have gotten over that it will be gun confiscation.. then you will live in a police state.. personally down for the next civil war because if somone comes for my guns ill be laying them down and they wont be getting back up.. fuck obama and the camps he payed fema to build and hold civilians.. his name isnt even obama... look up barry soetoro.. he isnt even a fucking american.. theres a documentary on this shit on youtube.. anyone who supports obama is a fucking idiot who has not done any fucking research and probably thought the 2nd amendment was for hunting..




Lucylastic -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 12:45:49 PM)

oh dear oh dear h dear
CHi.....IM behaving, honest Iam....




mnottertail -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 1:07:16 PM)

quote:


the second amendment allows us to have firearms as capable as those used by the military in the event we ever have to rise against the government because it will be the military we will be facing off against to end tyranny...


Among all the other ridiculous asswipe in that post the second amendment clearly does not.




jlf1961 -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 1:10:38 PM)

I have a solution, the government should only allow those of at least 1/4 Native American blood and higher to own guns, and make it mandatory for the rest of the population of the US to stay blind drunk when not at work.

And while we are at it, revoke speed limits and legalize pot.




tazzygirl -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 1:29:55 PM)

quote:

the second amendment allows us to have firearms as capable as those used by the military in the event we ever have to rise against the government because it will be the military we will be facing off against to end tyranny


Please do show me where it says "as capable as those used by the military"




Moonhead -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 1:33:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

He had with me... that he reneged upon a while back.

My mistake: I sometimes get those bum piccies confused...
[;)]




Fightdirecto -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 1:42:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ronnie1986
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. – Second Amendment



[image]local://upfiles/42188/A8A494D5B49B41D59DB35309E6FBC8F6.jpg[/image]




subrob1967 -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 2:08:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

He had with me... that he reneged upon a while back.



No I haven't... You tried to blame me because I won't hand you a link to my post on a platter... I've lived up to terms of the bet, it's not my fault you're too lazy to search every thread on CM to find it.




bossman777 -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 2:10:31 PM)

It doesn't tazzy. You have to read more than one sentence. Like Tench Coxe, whom you probably never heard of due to a government run education, or Miller v. US, where the Supreme Court said the amendment *only* protected arms suitable for military service. Now I'm told it was meant only to protect guns for sport and hunting... not resistance to an out of control federal military-industrial complex that has us fighting undeclared wars in hundreds of locations around the globe and sucking us dry to pay for it... DO SOME RESEARCH. If you expect to remain ignorant and free, then you expect what never was and never will be.




Lucylastic -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 2:13:23 PM)

LMAO...oh some one save this clusterfuck for me please, I have to go out...




tazzygirl -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 2:13:42 PM)

quote:

where does it not say that... if its to fight tyranny would you want to use a fucking sharpened spoon?


No, lets use a fucking spork intead.

quote:

i mean none of this really matters because there is already groups forming.. if the president goes in the wrong direction as he is there is going to be a war whether you like it or not.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9sMv9mcdc4 that guys not alone


You mean the one that apologized.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/15/james-yeager-tactical-response_n_2478594.html

quote:

this shits allot more real than you morons realise.. none of you seem very educated i cant really speak as i never gave to fucks about english class but you guys seem kind of stupid.. this is a huge deal and many militias have actually started preparing for whats to come.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=W2kkax7WOKI ..dudes my hero lol


Wow, the "dude" who talked about going into the streets and killing people is your hero.... doesnt surprise me at all.

As far as the 2nd, you arent too swift about history are you. The second allowed for a well armed militia... in place of a standing army. We have a standing army.. no more need for a well armed militia.

The SC determined that the 2nd allowed you to own guns. No where in any writings does it detail that you are entitled to possessing weapons equal to that of the military.

Even the SC, which affirmed your right to own a gun, states the government has within its power to determine what guns you can have and how you should keep them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller#Decision





mnottertail -> RE: Latest threat of impeachment against President Obama (1/16/2013 2:19:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ronnie1986


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

the second amendment allows us to have firearms as capable as those used by the military in the event we ever have to rise against the government because it will be the military we will be facing off against to end tyranny


Please do show me where it says "as capable as those used by the military"



where does it not say that... if its to fight tyranny would you want to use a fucking sharpened spoon? i mean none of this really matters because there is already groups forming.. if the president goes in the wrong direction as he is there is going to be a war whether you like it or not.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9sMv9mcdc4 that guys not alone.. this shits allot more real than you morons realise.. none of you seem very educated i cant really speak as i never gave to fucks about english class but you guys seem kind of stupid.. this is a huge deal and many militias have actually started preparing for whats to come.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=W2kkax7WOKI ..dudes my hero lol


I dunno, we deal with imbeciles every day that think they are brilliant but are prima facie, veritable spouting geysers of stupidity.

Yeah, and as for the millions, and the war?  We had a white president reluctantly freeing black people, now we might have a black president reluctantly freeing people.





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125