DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
If it were under my system of justice, rapists would absolutely have parental rights but that's assuming they live through the lethal injection, electric chair, firing squad and ten minutes alone in a room for the victim and each family member. After that, 20 years in prison and then the child that they fathered would be allowed that same ten minutes in that same empty room. On a strange twist, though, wasn't there a female school teacher that became pregnant by a student that she was convicted of raping (statuatory)? I'm pretty sure there was. I could be wrong about the rest of this but, didn't the father try to sue for custody and was denied? My memory on the issue is hazy but it raises some interesting questions vís-à-vís the topic of this thread. So, let's assume my memory is wrong: If the rapist is female and she becomes pregnant, would she abdicate the same rights that we all seem to agree a male relinquishes by nature of the crime? Obviously, there can be no doubt that she is the biological mother of the baby. Maternity isn't in question so, that's out. I'm not saying that rapists should have any rights. Personally, I think we're better off rid of them but, if we're going to make law, should we make sure that it's a law that takes both genders into account, equally. Surely, while there may be some precedents, here, we are, essentially, "making new law" because it's fairly un-chartered territory in that it's not "common practice" to either allow or deny parental rights to a rapist because it hasn't come up very often. Peace and comfort, Michael
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|