Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hlen5 I don't disagree with this. It's a conundrum, isn't it? I actually don't. As far as I'm concerned, the foetus is a parasite with the potential to one day become something else, and has no claim to the body of its mother. However, once it is taken out of her, I would say anyone can have a claim to it. Including the father, of course. At that point, it's a preterm, and since it has been disowned, she no longer has a claim to it. If the preterm is also viable, so much the better for those that might want to claim it. That's the closest I've gotten to an enforcable policy that goes as far as possible in supporting both sides without getting absurd. After all, being pro-life would necessarily imply preserving these lives when possible, which I'm "assuming" (yeah, right) they will when the preterms arrive, by both paying for them, adopting them, raising them, giving them good lives and so forth. And being pro-choice would necessarily imply not having to carry it to term. As far as I can see, only the anti-choice crowd is left out in this compromise. I am quite comfortable with leaving them out, though, so that's not a problem. IWYW, — Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|