mnottertail
Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AlexDom3 quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail What are you talking about? It's obvious as all hell. Some people are likely to donate to Republicans and some to Democrats. Those who donate to Democrats had one candidate to pick from and those who donate to Republicans had many. You can't just compare the Democratic candidate to any one Republican candidate and pretend like it means something. The Republican money was split up. Do you really not agree with this? uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....do you actually need pedantic dictionary definitions of COMBINED and ALL? No. Why? Do you actually need lessons in how to use the forum's quotation feature? It makes your posts much more difficult to read. Well, when I did quote it you needed someone to translate the English language for you. You lack the wherewithal to provide me lessons in any field of endeavor. Now, where is the citable, credible data that all combined republican candidates have recieved more money from the military than Obama, and then when we get done with that, what is the significance? Because I can tell you that Obama has raised more money from the military than ALL the first three elected republican presidents plus Romney, COMBINED.
_____________________________
Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30
|