RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 9:13:11 PM)

If I have to play "one of these maps is not like the other," even in vivid colors, you're no more worth discussing this with than the child in the other thread.

We'll see what November brings.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 9:21:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

If I have to play "one of these maps is not like the other," even in vivid colors, you're no more worth discussing this with than the child in the other thread.

We'll see what November brings.


The question (more in jest than seriousness, I believe from Hill) was "Were there even any Democrats in Kentucky?"

Both my map and your map says that there are more Democrats, than Republicans.

You wish to argue the point, and then throw snide and belittling comments out. I assume you do this due to your own insecurities and other personal issues. It seems that you must "count coup" over small, inconsequential issues in order to puff out your chest and make you feel superior about yourself.

Enjoy yourself, but be advised that not everyone is taken in by your subterfuge, nor your games.

Peace.

Firm






Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 9:25:05 PM)

Yeah. That's it exactly. Wow. You're amazing.

Do you read cards too?

There's a significant difference in the 2008/2011 maps. Call me crazy, but I think that's a factor in a presidential election.

The OP notes weak support in Kentucky. That's what the map shows too.

What a coincidence.

It's the "only one way" blindness that I criticized. If that's really what you believe, no point in discussion.




SternSkipper -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 9:47:04 PM)

quote:


Who is "Willard"?


You ACTUALLY think his name is MITT?




BitaTruble -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 11:26:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

My first thought when I read this was "Do they even HAVE Democrats in Kentucky?"
There's like 12 of em right?

Nah.. it only seems that way because Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul get so much press. [;)]




mnottertail -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/24/2012 4:35:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:


Who is "Willard"?


You ACTUALLY think his name is MITT?



Someone not knowing who Willard is, but is drawing otherworldly conclusions from some meaningless and pedestrian primaries, could be interpreted by any reasonable person, to be not contributing much by way of informed debate.

Although the map he pulled out may have been valid when Willard Wirtz was in government.




thompsonx -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/24/2012 7:01:05 AM)

quote:

You wish to argue the point, and then throw snide and belittling comments out. I assume you do this due to your own insecurities and other personal issues. It seems that you must "count coup" over small, inconsequential issues in order to puff out your chest and make you feel superior about yourself.

Enjoy yourself, but be advised that not everyone is taken in by your subterfuge, nor your games.


The above is an accurate discription of the moronic insipid drivel that comprise the overwhelming majority of your post. For you to accuse another of this is the height of hypocrisy. Your disingenuousness knows no bounds.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/24/2012 9:13:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:


Who is "Willard"?


You ACTUALLY think his name is MITT?



Someone not knowing who Willard is, but is drawing otherworldly conclusions from some meaningless and pedestrian primaries, could be interpreted by any reasonable person, to be not contributing much by way of informed debate.

Although the map he pulled out may have been valid when Willard Wirtz was in government.

I find it humorous, in a sad way, that you claim that you aren't supporting Obama (or "didn't vote for him" or "his not my guy", whatever) yet continue to downplay anything which even slightly reflects negatively on him, and cast any negativity you can about anyone who doesn't bow down and worship the ground he walks on.

If this kind of primary result (or the one in WV, where Obama actually lost delegates to a convict FFS) were about a Republican candidate, it would be the subject of thread after congratulatory thread about "the Death of the Republican Party" and "proof of the hatred for the Republican candidate" and all kinds of stuff.

But since it is The Exalted One, it's about how stupid the poster is, how little it all proves, and filled with belittling names for a candidate not even part of the primaries.

Go figure. [8|]

Firm




FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/24/2012 9:14:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

My first thought when I read this was "Do they even HAVE Democrats in Kentucky?"
There's like 12 of em right?

Nah.. it only seems that way because Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul get so much press. [;)]


Yuppers. There is that! [;)]

Firm




mnottertail -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/24/2012 10:02:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
]
I find it humorous, in a sad way, that you claim that you aren't supporting Obama (or "didn't vote for him" or "his not my guy", whatever) yet continue to downplay anything which even slightly reflects negatively on him, and cast any negativity you can about anyone who doesn't bow down and worship the ground he walks on.

If this kind of primary result (or the one in WV, where Obama actually lost delegates to a convict FFS) were about a Republican candidate, it would be the subject of thread after congratulatory thread about "the Death of the Republican Party" and "proof of the hatred for the Republican candidate" and all kinds of stuff.

But since it is The Exalted One, it's about how stupid the poster is, how little it all proves, and filled with belittling names for a candidate not even part of the primaries.

Go figure. [8|]

Firm


Dude, he aint no superstar, and I am not downplaying anything that isnt trivial.  I am putting it in perspective.  Even with that percentage he garnered more votes than Willard who, having a smaller universe, had less votes total but a larger percentage.

What is the significance of that?   Because otherwise, you are reporting that the whale is undoubtably one of the largest mammals alive today....remember it is the right that coming out here with the 'and your hope and change, and your infallable hero'  shit, and as is always the case, people tell them that aint true.

And it aint true, cuz the democratic populus is as lukewarm about the guy as the republican populus is tepid about Willard.

And do you think this is breaking fuckin news?

And more pure self-flagellating crap from the poor picked on right,  if what I say is true, and it is true, and everyone both sides know it, where is the companion piece 'Willard is cannibalizing the implosion of the republican nutjobs'  or whatever non-extant joe the plumber type of shit you offer as proof?

It aint no big deal, rassmussen is a piss poor polling company, MSNBC (I understand, cuz I dont go there or hear it) is rabidly liberal.

Don't solve any problems to be captain conundrum any more than it advances issues or compromises to be major obvious.

Now if you want to talk about this is going to be at some point a close race between miserable choices, you aint gonna have much to talk about cuz you and me will echo.

Other than nusiance candidates, I would say (as I said about Romney before the clown show started)

The presidential candidates of the two major parties are going to be:

Obama
Romney


That was my first and last thought on the subject, really...until you started huckstering your 1/3 1/3 1/3 crap.  No such thing is there in the world. You start dividing those 1/3rds into 1/3rds and those into 1/3rds and those further into 1/3rds....then you might start to have points.




   




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.492188E-02